H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Rick Fisher H2H: 1-1 (incl. walkovers)

Kim Warwick vs Rick Fisher: 1–0 excluding walkovers; 1–1 including 1 walkover. Across 2 main-draw results including walkovers, Kim Warwick leads 1–0 on clay, while Rick Fisher leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1975 Calcutta round of 16 4-2 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H including walkovers
1 – 1
2 main-draw results
Rick Fisher
USA Age 75 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Warwick 4-2 (ret.) Rick Fisher Match data Nov 21, 1975* R16 Calcutta ATP 250 Clay
Rick Fisher (w/o) Kim Warwick Match data Aug 21, 1973* R64 Merion ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Rick Fisher #571 #113 0 1,589 49 104 32.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Warwick Rick Fisher
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 1968 5–2 71.4% — 1,547 0 0
18 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0 1970 0–1 0.0% — 1,542 0 0
20 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0 1971 1–2 33.3% — 1,536 0 0
21 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0 1972 3–5 37.5% — 1,569 0 0
22 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0 1973 4–4 50.0% — 1,558 0 0
23 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0 1974 6–13 31.6% #122 1,515 0 0
24 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1 1975 5–16 23.8% #157 1,455 0 0
25 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1 1976 2–9 18.2% #193 1,411 0 0
26 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1 1977 3–13 18.8% #185 1,399 0 0
27 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2 1978 8–14 36.4% #174 1,472 0 0
28 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3 1979 6–12 33.3% #202 1,486 0 0
29 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3 1980 6–11 35.3% #215 1,455 0 0
30 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,441 0 0
31 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Warwick Rick Fisher
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1968 3 1 4 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1970 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 1971 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1972 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
22 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9% 1974 2 4 6 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1976 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 1977 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1978 4 3 7 57.1% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1979 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
29 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1980 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6% — 18 35 53 34.0% 11 31 42 26.2% 9 16 25 36.0% 11 22 33 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Warwick Rick Fisher
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 1968 1547 100.8 — — — — +37 -1 — 63.2% +0.53 1–0 — — +0.33
18 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) 98.8 +0.86 1970 1542 96.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.24
20 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23 1971 1536 101.1 — — — — +25 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 1–1 — +0.05
21 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 1972 1570 111.4 — — — — +24 — — 40.0% -0.33 1–0 1–1 — -0.13
22 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) 106.3 +3.10 1973 1558 107.7 — — — — +40 — — 40.0% -1.20 0–1 1–0 — +0.68
23 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) 108.6 +1.45 1974 1515 111.7 — — — — +36 +10 +22 31.7% -1.22 2–1 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.2 +0.98
24 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) 95.7 +0.01 1975 1455 117.1 — — — — +89 +8 — 30.4% -1.39 1–3 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 97.6 +1.57
25 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) 111.3 +1.00 1976 1412 99.8 — — — — +66 +27 — 24.0% -1.60 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 98.4 +0.99
26 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) 107.1 -1.65 1977 1400 112.5 — — — — +49 — +93 22.9% -1.71 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.69
27 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) 108.0 +3.20 1978 1472 111.5 — — — — +55 -65 +28 39.6% -0.64 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 100.7 +2.15
28 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) 104.8 -0.21 1979 1486 113.7 — — — — +30 — -2 40.0% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 3–2 (60%) 100.8 +2.01
29 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 98.1 +1.26 1980 1455 113.9 — — — — +44 — +49 41.0% -0.72 0–3 (0%) 2–6 (25%) 93.4 +2.53
30 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) 97.2 -1.50 1981 1441 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.05
31 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 99.8 +0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86 — 1590 115.5 — — — — +44 -3 +34 35.6% -0.99 11–22 (33%) 17–25 (40%) 94.4 +7.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.