H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Rolf Thung H2H: 2-0

Kim Warwick holds a 2–0 lead over Rolf Thung in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kim Warwick leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1978 Stuttgart Open round of 32 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Rolf Thung
NED Age 75 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Warwick #42 6-4 7-5 Rolf Thung #429 Match data Jul 20, 1978* R32 Stuttgart Open ATP 250 Clay
Kim Warwick 6-4 6-4 Rolf Thung Match data Sep 17, 1975* R64 Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Rolf Thung #662 #86 0 1,532 21 68 23.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Warwick Rolf Thung
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1968 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0 1970 0–1 0.0% — 1,469 0 0
19 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,456 0 0
21 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0 1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,444 0 0
22 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0 1974 4–7 36.4% #150 1,475 0 0
23 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0 1975 11–28 28.2% #134 1,494 0 0
24 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1 1976 3–19 13.6% #182 1,406 0 0
25 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1 1977 2–5 28.6% #181 1,415 0 0
26 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1 1978 1–4 20.0% #328 1,401 0 0
27 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3 1980 0–1 0.0% #372 1,395 0 0
29 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Warwick Rolf Thung
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1970 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 1972 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1973 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 1974 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9% 1975 1 5 6 16.7% 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 9 15 40.0%
24 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 1976 2 3 5 40.0% 1 10 11 9.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 1978 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6% — 4 13 17 23.5% 7 33 40 17.5% 3 9 12 25.0% 7 13 20 35.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Warwick Rolf Thung
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1484 91.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.03
17 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42 1970 1469 97.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.14
19 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23 1972 1457 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.10
21 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 1973 1444 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.16
22 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) — +3.10 1974 1475 110.5 — — — — +54 +6 +91 44.8% -0.38 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.89
23 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) — +1.45 1975 1494 122.5 — — — — +57 -25 — 28.6% -1.44 3–2 (60%) 3–6 (33%) — +1.33
24 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.01 1976 1406 108.8 — — — — +127 -26 +70 20.0% -1.82 3–4 (43%) 1–6 (14%) — +1.63
25 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) — +1.00 1977 1416 101.3 — — — — +103 — +10 35.3% -0.82 0–1 0–1 — +0.35
26 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.65 1978 1401 103.2 — — — — — -20 — 27.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.50
27 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) — +3.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.21 1980 1396 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.02
29 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86 — 1533 114.2 — — — — +77 -21 +60 27.9% -1.39 7–11 (39%) 7–15 (32%) 95.7 +5.81

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.