H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Roscoe Tanner H2H: 4-5

Roscoe Tanner holds a 5–4 lead over Kim Warwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Roscoe Tanner leads 2–1 on clay, while Kim Warwick leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Roscoe Tanner won the 1983 Australian Open first round 7-6 6-2 3-6 6-3.

AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 5
9 main draw meetings
USA Age 74 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Dec 1, 1983* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Grass Roscoe Tanner #38 7-6 6-2 3-6 6-3 Kim Warwick #99 Match data
Aug 15, 1982* La Costa Wct ATP 250 QF Hard Roscoe Tanner #23 4-6 6-3 7-6 Kim Warwick #49 Match data
Nov 17, 1979* Taipei ATP 250 QF Carpet Kim Warwick #54 6-4 7-6 Roscoe Tanner #5 Match data
Nov 5, 1977* Tokyo Outdoor ATP 250 QF Clay Kim Warwick #44 6-1 4-6 6-3 Roscoe Tanner #11 Match data
Nov 5, 1976* Tokyo Outdoor ATP 250 R16 Clay Roscoe Tanner #11 6-0 6-1 Kim Warwick #69 Match data
Oct 21, 1976* Sydney Indoor ATP 250 R32 Hard Kim Warwick #81 7-6 3-6 6-0 Roscoe Tanner #12 Match data
Sep 7, 1976* US Open Grand Slam R32 Clay Roscoe Tanner #11 6-2 6-4 Kim Warwick #77 Match data
Mar 13, 1976* Memphis Wct ATP 250 R16 Carpet Roscoe Tanner #11 6-2 6-7(5) 7-6(0) Kim Warwick #51 Match data
Oct 18, 1974* Tokyo ATP 250 QF Hard Kim Warwick #69 6-2 6-3 Roscoe Tanner #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,945 290 273 51.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Roscoe Tanner #789 #4 0 2,158 595 298 66.6% 1 1 0 0 15 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Warwick Roscoe Tanner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0 1969 0–2 0.0% 1,479 0 0
18 1970 6–8 42.9% 1,472 0 0 1970 0–9 0.0% 1,417 0 0
19 1971 4–7 36.4% 1,467 0 0 1971 16–10 61.5% 1,703 0 0
20 1972 11–9 55.0% 1,569 0 0 1972 29–14 67.4% 1,911 0 0
21 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,559 0 0 1973 45–30 60.0% #24 1,812 0 0
22 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,717 0 0 1974 66–28 70.2% #14 1,959 0 2
23 1975 28–24 53.8% #49 1,726 0 0 1975 65–24 73.0% #9 1,965 0 5
24 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,746 0 1 1976 70–28 71.4% #11 2,012 0 9
25 1977 35–29 54.7% #50 1,710 0 1 1977 52–30 63.4% #15 1,880 1 11
26 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,788 0 1 1978 59–24 71.1% #11 1,935 1 13
27 1979 37–27 57.8% #52 1,804 0 2 1979 61–19 76.2% #5 2,025 1 15
28 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,926 0 3 1980 42–16 72.4% #13 1,993 1 16
29 1981 6–12 33.3% #29 1,743 0 3 1981 51–22 69.9% #12 1,901 1 17
30 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,799 0 3 1982 20–17 54.1% #43 1,779 1 17
31 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,688 0 3 1983 16–13 55.2% #36 1,872 1 17
32 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,686 0 3 1984 3–11 21.4% #249 1,679 1 17
33 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,664 0 3 1985 0–1 0.0% #794 1,661 1 17
36 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,652 0 3