H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Steve Krulevitz H2H: 0-2

Steve Krulevitz holds a 2–0 lead over Kim Warwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Steve Krulevitz leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Steve Krulevitz won the 1977 North Conway round of 32 0-6 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Steve Krulevitz
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Steve Krulevitz 0-6 6-4 6-3 Kim Warwick #39 Match data Aug 3, 1977* R32 North Conway ATP 250 Clay
Steve Krulevitz 6-0 2-1 (ret.) Kim Warwick Match data Nov 10, 1976* R32 Hong Kong Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Steve Krulevitz #602 #70 0 1,766 122 201 37.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Warwick Steve Krulevitz
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0
19 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0 1970 1–5 16.7% — 1,460 0 0
20 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0 1971 2–7 22.2% — 1,477 0 0
21 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0 1972 0–3 0.0% — 1,452 0 0
22 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0 1973 1–4 20.0% #234 1,438 0 0
23 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0 1974 16–23 41.0% #91 1,539 0 0
24 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1 1975 13–27 32.5% #131 1,567 0 0
25 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1 1976 23–23 50.0% #77 1,751 0 0
26 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1 1977 14–21 40.0% #99 1,689 0 0
27 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2 1978 6–15 28.6% #205 1,581 0 0
28 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3 1979 6–13 31.6% #152 1,582 0 0
29 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3 1980 19–23 45.2% #134 1,613 0 0
30 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3 1981 14–13 51.9% #82 1,655 0 0
31 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3 1982 7–21 25.0% #99 1,497 0 0
32 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3 1983 0–2 0.0% #210 1,472 0 0
33 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Warwick Steve Krulevitz
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 1971 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 1973 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9% 1974 2 5 7 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 1975 1 3 4 25.0% 5 12 17 29.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 11 18 38.9%
25 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1976 5 4 9 55.6% 10 12 22 45.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 6 12 50.0%
26 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
27 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1979 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1980 10 8 18 55.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
30 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1981 7 6 13 53.8% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 1 6 7 14.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
32 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6% — 33 50 83 39.8% 57 92 149 38.3% 14 21 35 40.0% 18 38 56 32.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Warwick Steve Krulevitz
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42 1969 1483 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.14
19 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.86 1970 1460 106.5 — — — — — +48 — 26.7% -2.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.48
20 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23 1971 1477 108.2 — — — — +44 +41 — 25.0% -1.79 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.90
21 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 1972 1453 104.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.17
22 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) — +3.10 1973 1439 107.1 — — — — — — +62 30.8% -1.08 0–1 1–0 — -0.17
23 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) — +1.45 1974 1539 121.2 — — — — -52 -3 +6 44.8% -0.37 4–8 (33%) 7–3 (70%) — +1.61
24 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.01 1975 1567 131.8 — — — — -45 -21 — 35.5% -0.75 5–6 (45%) 3–7 (30%) — -1.60
25 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) — +1.00 1976 1751 135.7 — — — — -83 -96 -194 49.1% -0.06 6–7 (46%) 6–2 (75%) — -0.28
26 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.65 1977 1690 135.8 — — — — -58 -3 — 40.2% -0.52 4–4 (50%) 3–7 (30%) — -1.53
27 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) — +3.20 1978 1581 119.8 — — — — +15 +38 -43 30.0% -1.32 3–3 (50%) 1–5 (17%) — +0.20
28 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.21 1979 1582 119.9 — — — — +6 +10 -38 41.2% -0.59 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.44
29 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.26 1980 1614 129.7 — — — — +37 -48 — 46.0% -0.26 5–5 (50%) 8–6 (57%) — +2.70
30 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.50 1981 1655 121.0 — — — — +18 -18 — 49.3% -0.39 6–5 (55%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.99
31 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.49 1982 1498 113.2 — — — — +18 +84 +43 33.8% -1.20 4–8 (33%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.91
32 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40 1983 1473 95.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.80 0–1 — — +0.32
33 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86 — 1767 130.9 — — — — -17 -12 -19 40.8% -0.64 40–57 (41%) 39–41 (49%) 96.9 +0.99

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.