H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Terry Moor H2H: 0-1

Terry Moor holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Warwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Terry Moor leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Terry Moor won the 1980 North Conway round of 32 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Terry Moor
USA Age 74 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Terry Moor #52 6-1 6-3 Kim Warwick #36 Match data Jul 30, 1980* R32 North Conway ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Terry Moor #554 #32 0 1,924 237 228 51.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Warwick Terry Moor
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0 1973 1–2 33.3% #180 1,500 0 0
22 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0 1974 0–3 0.0% #318 1,477 0 0
23 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0 1975 0–1 0.0% #396 1,456 0 0
24 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1 1976 9–11 45.0% #71 1,576 0 0
25 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1 1977 29–23 55.8% #53 1,762 0 0
26 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1 1978 35–32 52.2% #73 1,761 0 0
27 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2 1979 35–26 57.4% #38 1,821 0 1
28 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3 1980 34–26 56.7% #53 1,850 0 1
29 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3 1981 26–25 51.0% #57 1,749 0 1
30 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3 1982 18–22 45.0% #95 1,697 0 1
31 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3 1983 8–9 47.1% #100 1,676 0 1
32 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3 1984 28–19 59.6% #34 1,797 0 2
33 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3 1985 13–22 37.1% #104 1,617 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 1986 0–5 0.0% #621 1,563 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #552 1,567 0 2
36 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Warwick Terry Moor
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1973 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
22 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 1974 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9% 1975 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 1976 2 4 6 33.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1977 5 7 12 41.7% 19 9 28 67.9% — — — — 5 7 12 41.7%
26 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 15 10 25 60.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 14 25 44.0%
27 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1979 11 6 17 64.7% 20 10 30 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 7 9 22.2%
28 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1980 10 6 16 62.5% 16 10 26 61.5% — — — — 8 10 18 44.4%
29 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1981 8 9 17 47.1% 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 9 7 16 56.3%
30 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1982 5 7 12 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 10 22 54.5%
31 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
32 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1984 18 8 26 69.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9%
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 4 9 13 30.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 8 12 33.3%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
36 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6% — 70 65 135 51.9% 96 73 169 56.8% 13 14 27 48.1% 58 76 134 43.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Warwick Terry Moor
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 1973 1500 105.1 — — — — — +51 — 33.3% -1.83 — — — +0.16
22 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) — +3.10 1974 1478 104.6 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.62 0–2 0–1 — -0.07
23 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) — +1.45 1975 1456 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.22
24 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.01 1976 1576 124.8 — — — — -56 +37 — 45.1% -0.59 5–5 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.06
25 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) — +1.00 1977 1763 137.5 — — — — -165 0 — 55.5% +0.17 7–10 (41%) 12–6 (67%) — +0.54
26 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.65 1978 1762 138.6 — — — — -80 +14 -169 52.5% +0.19 12–10 (55%) 7–9 (44%) — +1.06
27 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) — +3.20 1979 1821 141.2 — — — — -76 +9 -203 53.2% +0.20 16–7 (70%) 12–10 (55%) — -2.04
28 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.21 1980 1850 149.8 — — — — -13 -29 — 54.8% +0.36 6–6 (50%) 6–6 (50%) — -2.95
29 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.26 1981 1750 145.5 — — — — +55 0 — 52.8% +0.02 7–10 (41%) 5–4 (56%) — -3.25
30 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.50 1982 1698 143.0 — — — — +39 +23 — 47.5% -0.25 4–9 (31%) 10–5 (67%) — -1.74
31 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.49 1983 1677 122.3 — — — — +52 +3 — 46.7% -0.24 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — +1.11
32 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40 1984 1797 137.4 — — — — +23 -106 -150 54.6% +0.27 12–5 (71%) 8–8 (50%) — +0.42
33 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42 1985 1617 128.3 — — — — +16 +101 +10 37.8% -0.62 9–7 (56%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.73
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1563 106.2 — — — — +28 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.34
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1567 109.4 — — — — +24 — — 37.5% -0.75 1–1 0–1 — -0.33
36 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86 — 1924 144.4 — — — — -17 +2 -135 50.5% -0.01 83–77 (52%) 76–61 (55%) 103.9 -1.39

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.