H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Tim Mayotte H2H: 2-0

Kim Warwick holds a 2–0 lead over Tim Mayotte in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kim Warwick leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1982 Indian Wells Open round of 32 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Tim Mayotte
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Warwick #51 6-4 6-2 Tim Mayotte #30 Match data Feb 18, 1982* R32 Indian Wells Open ATP 250 Hard
Kim Warwick #37 6-4 6-3 Tim Mayotte Match data Jul 17, 1980* R32 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Tim Mayotte #1,103 #7 1,274 2,049 338 195 63.4% 0 0 0 1 11 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Warwick Tim Mayotte
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0 1979 0–4 0.0% #420 1,453 0 0
19 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0 1980 4–4 50.0% #171 1,531 0 0
20 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0 1981 31–16 66.0% #33 1,802 0 0
21 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0 1982 33–22 60.0% #30 1,810 0 0
22 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0 1983 23–18 56.1% #16 1,904 0 0
23 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0 1984 23–20 53.5% #44 1,766 0 0
24 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1 1985 48–19 71.6% #12 1,915 0 1
25 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1 1986 26–15 63.4% #15 1,857 0 2
26 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1 1987 44–13 77.2% #9 1,982 0 7
27 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2 1988 47–16 74.6% #10 1,918 0 11
28 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3 1989 29–15 65.9% #13 1,917 0 12
29 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3 1990 18–19 48.6% #37 1,747 0 12
30 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3 1991 12–13 48.0% #115 1,717 0 12
31 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3 1992 0–1 0.0% #1097 1,700 0 12
32 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Warwick Tim Mayotte
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
20 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 1981 15 8 23 65.2% — — — — 11 5 16 68.8% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1982 8 9 17 47.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 11 7 18 61.1%
22 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 1983 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 7 6 13 53.8%
23 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9% 1984 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 6 10 40.0%
24 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 1985 19 5 24 79.2% — — — — 13 5 18 72.2% 16 9 25 64.0%
25 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1986 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 9 5 14 64.3%
26 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 1987 18 8 26 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 20 2 22 90.9%
27 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1988 28 8 36 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 14 6 20 70.0%
28 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1989 15 7 22 68.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 4 11 63.6%
29 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1990 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 14 7 21 66.7%
30 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1991 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1992 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
32 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6% — 131 85 216 60.6% 5 13 18 27.8% 90 36 126 71.4% 112 61 173 64.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Warwick Tim Mayotte
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42 1979 1454 104.1 — — — — — +42 — 18.2% -1.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.10
19 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.86 1980 1532 126.8 — — — — +56 — — 39.1% -0.43 4–0 (100%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.12
20 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23 1981 1802 138.6 — — — — -9 — -48 64.2% +0.75 6–6 (50%) 13–8 (62%) — +2.78
21 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 1982 1811 143.3 — — — — -28 — +49 57.6% +0.55 12–11 (52%) 11–10 (52%) — -1.18
22 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) — +3.10 1983 1904 151.7 — — — — -70 — +58 55.5% +0.31 6–4 (60%) 9–13 (41%) — -3.46
23 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) — +1.45 1984 1767 146.1 — — — — +46 -313 +156 55.7% +0.31 4–8 (33%) 10–12 (45%) — -1.63
24 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.01 1985 1916 157.8 — — — — +85 — +6 66.5% +1.07 11–7 (61%) 16–14 (53%) — -1.93
25 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) — +1.00 1986 1858 145.9 — — — — -38 — +200 63.2% +0.63 8–11 (42%) 11–7 (61%) — -2.66
26 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.65 1987 1982 154.9 — — — — +26 — +41 72.1% +1.58 9–11 (45%) 10–12 (45%) — +0.87
27 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) — +3.20 1988 1919 150.1 — — — — +19 — +104 67.7% +1.13 14–3 (82%) 11–5 (69%) — +1.19
28 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.21 1989 1917 154.1 — — — — +8 -445 +83 65.0% +1.02 4–7 (36%) 12–7 (63%) — -1.91
29 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.26 1990 1747 145.9 — — — — +38 — +168 50.0% +0.19 9–9 (50%) 8–8 (50%) — +0.07
30 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.50 1991 1718 133.9 +0.08 +1.03 0.987 50.0% -19 — +211 50.0% +0.02 2–5 (29%) 8–4 (67%) — -0.69
31 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.49 1992 1700 100.9 -3.58 +0.76 0.994 47.0% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.09
32 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86 — 2049 154.9 -0.07 +1.02 0.988 49.8% +12 -259 +73 61.2% +0.74 89–83 (52%) 122–106 (54%) 95.3 -1.63

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.