H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Kim Warwick vs Tom Okker H2H: 0-1
Tom Okker holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Warwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tom Okker leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tom Okker won the 1975 Wimbledon third round 6-3 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 82
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 1975* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Tom Okker | 6-3 6-2 6-4 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Warwick | #1,294 | #15 | 15 | 1,945 | 290 | 273 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Tom Okker | #438 | #3 | 0 | 2,198 | 672 | 279 | 70.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 37 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Warwick | Tom Okker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1973 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1974 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1975 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #49 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1976 | 28–32 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 89–23 | 79.5% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1977 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 86–25 | 77.5% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 15 |
| 26 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #41 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 59–27 | 68.6% | — | 1,948 | 0 | 20 |
| 27 | 1979 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #52 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 74–31 | 70.5% | — | 2,007 | 0 | 22 |
| 28 | 1980 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,926 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 69–31 | 69.0% | — | 2,041 | 0 | 23 |
| 29 | 1981 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #29 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 91–23 | 79.8% | #4 | 2,166 | 0 | 30 |
| 30 | 1982 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #6 | 2,061 | 0 | 33 |
| 31 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 39–13 | 75.0% | #11 | 2,068 | 0 | 35 |
| 32 | 1984 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #196 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #23 | 1,956 | 0 | 35 |
| 33 | 1985 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #497 | 1,664 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,931 | 0 | 36 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,879 | 0 | 36 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,772 | 0 | 37 |
| 36 | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #600 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #107 | 1,715 | 0 | 37 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 37 |