Kim Warwick
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roscoe Tanner | 4 | 5 | 9 | Dec 1, 1983 | H2H |
| Geoff Masters | 4 | 5 | 9 | Oct 27, 1978 | H2H |
| Sandy Mayer | 3 | 5 | 8 | Mar 14, 1981 | H2H |
| Raul Ramirez | 3 | 5 | 8 | Apr 29, 1978 | H2H |
| Tim Gullikson | 2 | 5 | 7 | Nov 10, 1983 | — |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Tomas Smid holds a 4–0 lead over Kim Warwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tomas Smid leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1985 Hong Kong Open round of 32 3-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Smid | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | Kim Warwick | Match data | Nov 21, 1985* | R32 | Hong Kong Open | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Tomas Smid | 6-2 6-0 | Kim Warwick | Match data | Feb 12, 1982* | R16 | Richmond Wct | ATP 250 | Carpet |
| Tomas Smid | 6-1 2-6 6-3 | Kim Warwick | Match data | Mar 15, 1980* | SF | Stuttgart Indoor | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Tomas Smid | 6-4 6-3 | Kim Warwick | Match data | Apr 14, 1978* | R16 | Monte-Carlo Masters | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Warwick | #1,294 | #15 | 15 | 1,946 | 288 | 269 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,994 | 490 | 317 | 60.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Warwick | Tomas Smid | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1973 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #62 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1974 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #48 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1975 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #49 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,871 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1976 | 28–32 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #23 | 1,923 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1977 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #42 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 49–28 | 63.6% | #28 | 1,854 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #41 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,893 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1979 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #52 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 1980 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,927 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 1981 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #29 | 1,758 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 1982 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,786 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,723 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,681 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,730 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 1984 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #196 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,657 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | 1985 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #497 | 1,667 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,536 | 0 | 9 |
| 36 | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #600 | 1,655 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Kim Warwick | Tomas Smid | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1969 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 21 | 1973 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1977 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 22 | 1974 | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 1978 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 22 | 12 | 34 | 64.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% |
| 23 | 1975 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 1979 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 33 | 12 | 45 | 73.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% |
| 24 | 1976 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 1980 | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 16 | 7 | 23 | 69.6% | — | — | — | — | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% |
| 25 | 1977 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 17 | 10 | 27 | 63.0% | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1981 | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% | 23 | 11 | 34 | 67.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% |
| 26 | 1978 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 1982 | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 24 | 11 | 35 | 68.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 26 | 12 | 38 | 68.4% |
| 27 | 1979 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 1983 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 36 | 12 | 48 | 75.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% |
| 28 | 1980 | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1984 | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 17 | 11 | 28 | 60.7% |
| 29 | 1981 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1985 | 18 | 9 | 27 | 66.7% | 18 | 7 | 25 | 72.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% |
| 30 | 1982 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1986 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% |
| 31 | 1983 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1987 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 18 | 11 | 29 | 62.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% |
| 32 | 1984 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1988 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% |
| 33 | 1985 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1988 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 59 | 68 | 127 | 46.5% | 80 | 74 | 154 | 51.9% | 95 | 70 | 165 | 57.6% | 54 | 57 | 111 | 48.6% | — | 111 | 71 | 182 | 61.0% | 247 | 135 | 382 | 64.7% | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | 115 | 96 | 211 | 54.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Kim Warwick | Tomas Smid | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1969 | 1483 | 95.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 1469 | 102.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +41 | 43.8% | -0.16 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | +1.42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 1464 | 110.3 | — | — | — | — | +69 | — | +62 | 41.2% | -0.47 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.86 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 1566 | 111.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +71 | 52.9% | -0.20 | 2–0 | 7–2 (78%) | — | +0.23 | 1976 | 1542 | 125.7 | — | — | — | — | -33 | +68 | — | 51.6% | +0.16 | 0–5 (0%) | 2–4 (33%) | — | +0.89 |
| 21 | 1973 | 1567 | 117.1 | — | — | — | — | -67 | -6 | +9 | 41.9% | -0.62 | 4–6 (40%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.29 | 1977 | 1639 | 136.8 | — | — | — | — | -104 | +44 | -135 | 51.3% | +0.20 | 1–7 (13%) | 2–6 (25%) | — | +1.24 |
| 22 | 1974 | 1718 | 135.3 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | -71 | 57.9% | +0.40 | 8–8 (50%) | 9–5 (64%) | — | +3.10 | 1978 | 1799 | 150.6 | — | — | — | — | -122 | +63 | — | 54.8% | +0.44 | 11–8 (58%) | 8–7 (53%) | — | +0.34 |
| 23 | 1975 | 1740 | 131.7 | — | — | — | — | -44 | -122 | +35 | 53.0% | -0.02 | 8–6 (57%) | 10–3 (77%) | — | +1.45 | 1979 | 1871 | 159.1 | — | — | — | — | -70 | +110 | — | 63.8% | +0.89 | 7–7 (50%) | 12–6 (67%) | — | -1.69 |
| 24 | 1976 | 1750 | 140.2 | — | — | — | — | -100 | -13 | +61 | 52.1% | +0.06 | 6–14 (30%) | 9–9 (50%) | — | +0.01 | 1980 | 1923 | 155.5 | — | — | — | — | +11 | +3 | — | 65.7% | +0.98 | 7–5 (58%) | 6–2 (75%) | — | -2.22 |
| 25 | 1977 | 1714 | 136.9 | — | — | — | — | -91 | +94 | +27 | 53.7% | +0.18 | 14–4 (78%) | 8–3 (73%) | — | +1.00 | 1981 | 1854 | 157.2 | — | — | — | — | +46 | +62 | — | 60.1% | +0.90 | 11–6 (65%) | 15–9 (63%) | — | -1.40 |
| 26 | 1978 | 1790 | 148.2 | — | — | — | — | -41 | -3 | +16 | 52.6% | +0.14 | 12–6 (67%) | 12–12 (50%) | — | -1.65 | 1982 | 1894 | 156.3 | — | — | — | — | +23 | +3 | -326 | 63.8% | +1.01 | 16–10 (62%) | 14–11 (56%) | — | -0.62 |
| 27 | 1979 | 1808 | 135.7 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -87 | +52 | 56.5% | +0.25 | 9–5 (64%) | 13–6 (68%) | — | +3.20 | 1983 | 1903 | 155.6 | — | — | — | — | -53 | +56 | -203 | 61.5% | +0.89 | 12–9 (57%) | 6–10 (38%) | — | -2.90 |
| 28 | 1980 | 1928 | 142.9 | — | — | — | — | -103 | -179 | +49 | 57.2% | +0.61 | 16–7 (70%) | 8–12 (40%) | — | -0.21 | 1984 | 1841 | 154.8 | — | — | — | — | +61 | -25 | -66 | 59.9% | +0.58 | 10–7 (59%) | 10–11 (48%) | — | -1.32 |
| 29 | 1981 | 1758 | 117.9 | — | — | — | — | -77 | — | +186 | 47.2% | +0.08 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–4 (20%) | — | +1.26 | 1985 | 1805 | 149.1 | — | — | — | — | +56 | +68 | -70 | 59.1% | +0.51 | 14–6 (70%) | 13–8 (62%) | — | +1.83 |
| 30 | 1982 | 1786 | 145.7 | — | — | — | — | +25 | -97 | +71 | 52.1% | +0.49 | 5–5 (50%) | 2–7 (22%) | — | -1.50 | 1986 | 1724 | 130.9 | — | — | — | — | +7 | +71 | +37 | 52.3% | +0.30 | 10–7 (59%) | 6–15 (29%) | — | +1.95 |
| 31 | 1983 | 1681 | 108.0 | — | — | — | — | +19 | — | — | 34.5% | -0.90 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.49 | 1987 | 1731 | 138.3 | — | — | — | — | -67 | +83 | — | 53.2% | +0.07 | 7–10 (41%) | 16–9 (64%) | — | -0.84 |
| 32 | 1984 | 1690 | 121.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +41 | +128 | 65.2% | +0.87 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–1 | — | +0.40 | 1988 | 1657 | 139.2 | — | — | — | — | +9 | +87 | — | 41.8% | -0.36 | 7–5 (58%) | 4–7 (36%) | — | -2.59 |
| 33 | 1985 | 1668 | 111.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.42 | 1989 | 1537 | 102.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +74 | — | 25.9% | -1.52 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.70 |
| 36 | 1988 | 1655 | 100.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.20 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1947 | 139.8 | — | — | — | — | -34 | -32 | +42 | 52.5% | +0.13 | 94–71 (57%) | 86–71 (55%) | 110.5 | +1.86 | — | 1994 | 155.1 | — | — | — | — | -3 | +56 | -137 | 58.0% | +0.58 | 114–94 (55%) | 114–108 (51%) | 99.2 | -0.82 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roscoe Tanner | 4 | 5 | 9 | Dec 1, 1983 | H2H |
| Geoff Masters | 4 | 5 | 9 | Oct 27, 1978 | H2H |
| Sandy Mayer | 3 | 5 | 8 | Mar 14, 1981 | H2H |
| Raul Ramirez | 3 | 5 | 8 | Apr 29, 1978 | H2H |
| Tim Gullikson | 2 | 5 | 7 | Nov 10, 1983 | — |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yannick Noah | 3 | 8 | 11 | May 14, 1988 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 1 | 10 | 11 | Jan 19, 1986 | H2H |
| John McEnroe | 0 | 10 | 10 | Feb 6, 1987 | H2H |
| Guillermo Vilas | 1 | 9 | 10 | Aug 31, 1985 | H2H |
| Balazs Taroczy | 5 | 4 | 9 | Aug 8, 1986 | H2H |