H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Tsuyoshi Fukui H2H: 1-1

Kim Warwick and Tsuyoshi Fukui are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kim Warwick leads 1–0 on clay, while Tsuyoshi Fukui leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tsuyoshi Fukui won the 1982 Hong Kong Open round of 32 7-5 1-6 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick

AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H

1 – 1

2 main-draw meetings

Tsuyoshi Fukui

JPN Age 69 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Tsuyoshi Fukui	7-5 1-6 7-6	Kim Warwick #35	Match data	Nov 4, 1982*	R32	Hong Kong Open	ATP 250	Hard
Kim Warwick #58	6-4 6-4	Tsuyoshi Fukui	Match data	Oct 24, 1979*	R64	Japan Open	ATP 250	Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Kim Warwick	#1,294	#15	15	1,946	288	268	51.8%	0	0	0	0	3	3
Tsuyoshi Fukui	#1,070	#177	2	1,521	10	26	27.8%	0	0	0	0	0	0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Kim Warwick							Tsuyoshi Fukui
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
17	1969	0–1	0.0%	—	1,483	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1970	6–8	42.9%	—	1,468	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1971	4–7	36.4%	—	1,463	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1972	11–9	55.0%	—	1,566	0	0	1977	0–1	0.0%	—	1,495	0	0
21	1973	11–21	34.4%	#108	1,568	0	0	1978	0–2	0.0%	#374	1,490	0	0
22	1974	30–23	56.6%	#48	1,718	0	0	1979	0–3	0.0%	#252	1,464	0	0
23	1975	27–23	54.0%	#49	1,739	0	0	1980	2–2	50.0%	#232	1,485	0	0
24	1976	28–32	46.7%	#67	1,750	0	1	1981	2–2	50.0%	—	1,515	0	0
25	1977	35–29	54.7%	#42	1,713	0	1	1982	2–5	28.6%	—	1,500	0	0
26	1978	29–23	55.8%	#41	1,790	0	1	1983	0–2	0.0%	#177	1,478	0	0
27	1979	36–25	59.0%	#52	1,808	0	2	1984	0–2	0.0%	#295	1,459	0	0
28	1980	39–25	60.9%	#36	1,927	0	3	1985	1–2	33.3%	#321	1,467	0	0
29	1981	6–11	35.3%	#29	1,758	0	3	1986	1–1	50.0%	#315	1,480	0	0
30	1982	15–15	50.0%	#36	1,786	0	3	1987	1–2	33.3%	#422	1,494	0	0
31	1983	3–7	30.0%	#99	1,681	0	3	1988	1–1	50.0%	#388	1,499	0	0
32	1984	6–5	54.5%	#196	1,690	0	3	1989	0–1	0.0%	#1072	1,491	0	0
33	1985	1–3	25.0%	#497	1,667	0	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1988	1–1	50.0%	#600	1,655	0	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Kim Warwick																	Tsuyoshi Fukui
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
17	1969	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1970	1	1	2	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	5	5	10	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1971	1	2	3	33.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	3	4	7	42.9%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1972	1	1	2	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	10	6	16	62.5%	—	—	—	—	1977	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
21	1973	1	4	5	20.0%	7	8	15	46.7%	2	6	8	25.0%	1	3	4	25.0%	1978	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
22	1974	12	8	20	60.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	7	6	13	53.8%	11	8	19	57.9%	1979	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	0	2	2	0.0%
23	1975	5	7	12	41.7%	6	5	11	54.5%	5	3	8	62.5%	11	8	19	57.9%	1980	—	—	—	—	2	1	3	66.7%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
24	1976	5	6	11	45.5%	15	12	27	55.6%	6	5	11	54.5%	2	9	11	18.2%	1981	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%
25	1977	3	7	10	30.0%	17	10	27	63.0%	12	9	21	57.1%	3	3	6	50.0%	1982	1	1	2	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1	3	4	25.0%
26	1978	3	4	7	42.9%	11	7	18	61.1%	8	4	12	66.7%	7	8	15	46.7%	1983	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
27	1979	6	5	11	54.5%	9	9	18	50.0%	14	6	20	70.0%	7	5	12	58.3%	1984	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
28	1980	9	5	14	64.3%	10	10	20	50.0%	15	6	21	71.4%	5	4	9	55.6%	1985	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
29	1981	1	6	7	14.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	3	2	5	60.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	1986	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%
30	1982	7	6	13	53.8%	2	3	5	40.0%	2	3	5	40.0%	4	3	7	57.1%	1987	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
31	1983	3	4	7	42.9%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	1988	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1984	—	—	—	—	3	2	5	60.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	1989	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1985	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1988	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	59	68	127	46.5%	80	73	153	52.3%	95	70	165	57.6%	54	57	111	48.6%	—	4	7	11	36.4%	3	6	9	33.3%	—	—	—	—	3	13	16	18.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Kim Warwick																Tsuyoshi Fukui
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
17	1969	1483	95.0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-4.00	—	—	—	+0.09	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1970	1469	102.8	—	—	—	—	—	—	+41	43.8%	-0.16	1–2 (33%)	—	—	+1.42	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1971	1464	110.3	—	—	—	—	+69	—	+62	41.2%	-0.47	1–3 (25%)	2–1 (67%)	98.8	+0.86	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1972	1566	111.3	—	—	—	—	—	—	+71	52.9%	-0.20	2–0	7–2 (78%)	—	+0.23	1977	1496	99.7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-3.00	—	—	—	-0.12
21	1973	1568	115.6	—	—	—	—	-68	-6	+8	43.1%	-0.54	4–6 (40%)	2–2 (50%)	—	+0.49	1978	1491	110.9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	20.0%	-2.40	0–1	—	—	-0.31
22	1974	1719	135.2	—	—	—	—	+34	—	-72	57.9%	+0.40	8–8 (50%)	9–5 (64%)	106.3	+3.07	1979	1465	103.7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-2.67	—	—	—	+0.14
23	1975	1740	131.7	—	—	—	—	-43	-121	+35	53.0%	-0.02	8–6 (57%)	10–3 (77%)	108.6	+1.45	1980	1486	108.7	—	—	—	—	—	+38	—	40.0%	-0.80	2–0	1–1	—	+0.38
24	1976	1750	140.2	—	—	—	—	-100	-13	+61	52.1%	+0.06	6–14 (30%)	9–9 (50%)	95.7	0.00	1981	1515	120.3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	50.0%	-0.25	—	—	—	+0.16
25	1977	1714	136.9	—	—	—	—	-91	+94	+27	53.7%	+0.18	14–4 (78%)	8–3 (73%)	111.3	+1.00	1982	1500	104.6	—	—	—	—	+37	—	—	31.3%	-1.31	1–1	1–2 (33%)	—	+0.77
26	1978	1790	148.1	—	—	—	—	-41	-3	+16	52.6%	+0.14	12–6 (67%)	12–12 (50%)	107.1	-1.65	1983	1479	100.6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-2.50	—	—	—	+0.13
27	1979	1808	135.7	—	—	—	—	-13	-87	+52	56.5%	+0.25	9–5 (64%)	13–6 (68%)	108.0	+3.20	1984	1459	96.1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-3.75	—	0–1	—	+0.14
28	1980	1928	142.9	—	—	—	—	-103	-179	+49	57.2%	+0.61	16–7 (70%)	8–12 (40%)	104.8	-0.21	1985	1467	109.2	—	—	—	—	+17	—	—	33.3%	-1.00	—	0–1	—	+0.04
29	1981	1758	117.9	—	—	—	—	-77	—	+186	47.2%	+0.08	2–1 (67%)	1–4 (20%)	98.1	+1.26	1986	1480	105.7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	50.0%	-0.50	—	—	—	+0.24
30	1982	1786	145.7	—	—	—	—	+24	-97	+71	52.1%	+0.49	5–5 (50%)	2–7 (22%)	97.2	-1.50	1987	1495	124.0	—	—	—	—	+18	—	—	33.3%	-1.00	—	—	—	-0.30
31	1983	1681	108.0	—	—	—	—	+19	—	—	34.5%	-0.90	2–1 (67%)	1–2 (33%)	99.8	+0.49	1988	1500	101.1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	50.0%	-0.50	—	—	—	+0.17
32	1984	1690	121.4	—	—	—	—	—	+41	+128	65.2%	+0.87	3–2 (60%)	1–1	—	+0.40	1989	1491	101.6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	33.3%	-2.00	0–1	—	—	-0.11
33	1985	1668	111.3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	33.3%	-1.33	0–1	1–1	—	-0.42	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1988	1655	100.3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	40.0%	-0.20	1–0	0–1	—	+0.23	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	1947	139.7	—	—	—	—	-34	-32	+42	52.6%	+0.13	94–71 (57%)	86–71 (55%)	110.5	+1.90	—	1521	120.5	—	—	—	—	+27	+38	—	29.5%	-1.44	3–3 (50%)	2–5 (29%)	98.1	+3.69

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Kim Warwick's most-played ATP rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Roscoe Tanner	4	5	9	Dec 1, 1983	H2H
Geoff Masters	4	5	9	Oct 27, 1978	H2H
Sandy Mayer	3	5	8	Mar 14, 1981	H2H
Raul Ramirez	3	5	8	Apr 29, 1978	H2H
Tim Gullikson	2	5	7	Nov 10, 1983	—

Tsuyoshi Fukui's most-played ATP rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Morris Skip Strode	0	2	2	Nov 18, 1982	H2H
Kim Warwick	1	1	2	Nov 4, 1982	H2H
Haroon Ismail	1	1	2	Oct 22, 1980	H2H
Jim Grabb	0	1	1	Apr 19, 1989	H2H
Scott Davis	0	1	1	Apr 14, 1988	H2H