H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Van Winitsky H2H: 0-1

Van Winitsky holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Warwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Van Winitsky leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Van Winitsky won the 1981 Hong Kong Open round of 16 6-4 3-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Van Winitsky
USA Age 67 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Van Winitsky #83 6-4 3-0 (ret.) Kim Warwick #15 Match data Nov 6, 1981* R16 Hong Kong Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Van Winitsky #834 #35 0 1,855 106 133 44.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Warwick Van Winitsky
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1975 1–1 50.0% #282 1,505 0 0
17 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 1976 1–2 33.3% #239 1,527 0 0
18 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0 1977 8–7 53.3% #228 1,649 0 0
19 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0 1978 15–25 37.5% #132 1,591 0 0
20 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0 1979 6–14 30.0% #141 1,580 0 0
21 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0 1980 14–17 45.2% #90 1,678 0 0
22 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0 1981 16–12 57.1% #47 1,719 0 1
23 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0 1982 28–23 54.9% #53 1,699 0 3
24 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1 1983 10–17 37.0% #91 1,647 0 3
25 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1 1984 7–14 33.3% #133 1,565 0 3
26 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1 1985 0–1 0.0% #331 1,552 0 3
27 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Warwick Van Winitsky
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1976 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1977 2 1 3 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1978 4 4 8 50.0% 5 13 18 27.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
20 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1980 7 7 14 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
23 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9% 1982 1 4 5 20.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6%
24 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 1983 6 7 13 46.2% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
25 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1984 4 5 9 44.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6% — 35 38 73 47.9% 48 57 105 45.7% 2 10 12 16.7% 21 28 49 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Warwick Van Winitsky
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1506 94.8 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — +0.48
17 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 1976 1527 111.1 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.71 — — — -0.15
18 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42 1977 1650 135.8 — — — — -35 -21 — 51.5% -0.30 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) — -1.13
19 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.86 1978 1592 127.5 — — — — +61 -13 -54 42.2% -0.64 6–10 (38%) 4–7 (36%) — +2.52
20 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23 1979 1581 134.0 — — — — +71 -23 — 28.3% -1.46 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.14
21 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 1980 1678 132.8 — — — — -26 -25 — 47.7% -0.09 6–8 (43%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.39
22 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) — +3.10 1981 1720 130.7 — — — — -6 -61 — 55.4% +0.48 6–6 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — +1.69
23 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) — +1.45 1982 1699 144.3 — — — — +20 +43 — 52.0% -0.02 12–9 (57%) 10–5 (67%) — -1.05
24 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.01 1983 1648 139.5 — — — — +22 +53 — 39.7% -0.46 6–6 (50%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.74
25 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) — +1.00 1984 1565 117.3 — — — — +43 +76 -104 33.3% -1.02 6–3 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.48
26 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.65 1985 1552 101.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.06
27 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) — +3.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86 — 1855 140.6 — — — — +21 +5 -75 44.6% -0.38 47–48 (49%) 30–36 (45%) 99.0 +0.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.