H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Vladimir Zednik H2H: 1-0

Kim Warwick holds a 1–0 lead over Vladimir Zednik in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kim Warwick leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1974 Sydney International round of 32 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Vladimir Zednik
CZE Age 79 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Warwick 6-0 6-3 Vladimir Zednik Match data Jan 3, 1974* R32 Sydney International ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Vladimir Zednik #300 #35 0 1,757 113 158 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Warwick Vladimir Zednik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0 1968 1–1 50.0% — 1,500 0 0
22 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,561 0 0
23 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0 1970 6–7 46.2% — 1,576 0 0
24 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1 1971 17–20 45.9% — 1,629 0 0
25 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1 1972 19–20 48.7% — 1,653 0 1
26 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1 1973 14–24 36.8% #90 1,636 0 1
27 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2 1974 12–19 38.7% #93 1,635 0 1
28 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3 1975 3–11 21.4% #157 1,622 0 1
29 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3 1976 5–11 31.2% #106 1,593 0 1
30 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3 1977 9–13 40.9% #66 1,642 0 1
31 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3 1978 22–22 50.0% #70 1,660 0 2
32 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3 1979 1–7 12.5% #300 1,582 0 2
33 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,572 0 2
36 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Warwick Vladimir Zednik
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1968 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 1969 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9% 1970 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 1971 9 10 19 47.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
25 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1972 4 6 10 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
26 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 1973 0 3 3 0.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 9 12 25.0%
27 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 5 8 37.5%
28 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1975 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 7 7 0.0%
29 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1976 1 2 3 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3%
31 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 19 12 31 61.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
32 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1979 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6% — 18 34 52 34.6% 58 63 121 47.9% 11 19 30 36.7% 26 42 68 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Warwick Vladimir Zednik
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) 98.8 +0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 1968 1500 101.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.60 0–1 — — +0.06
22 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) 106.3 +3.10 1969 1562 110.4 — — — — +69 — — 58.8% +0.47 1–0 — — +0.42
23 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) 108.6 +1.45 1970 1576 112.1 — — — — — -41 -8 44.2% -0.47 3–1 (75%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.55
24 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) 95.7 +0.01 1971 1630 112.7 — — — — +20 -4 -140 46.0% -0.41 6–7 (46%) 6–4 (60%) 100.6 +2.74
25 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) 111.3 +1.00 1972 1654 127.7 — — — — +75 -41 — 47.8% -0.14 5–3 (63%) 10–5 (67%) 106.7 +1.73
26 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) 107.1 -1.65 1973 1637 128.2 — — — — +13 +39 -160 42.9% -0.51 2–5 (29%) 3–8 (27%) 94.4 -0.89
27 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) 108.0 +3.20 1974 1636 122.3 — — — — -16 -23 -87 43.5% -0.32 3–7 (30%) 8–5 (62%) 100.5 -0.80
28 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) 104.8 -0.21 1975 1623 129.9 — — — — -78 +27 — 29.0% -0.93 3–1 (75%) 1–6 (14%) 100.9 -1.26
29 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 98.1 +1.26 1976 1593 122.5 — — — — -42 -10 — 38.1% -0.67 3–6 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 102.3 -0.27
30 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) 97.2 -1.50 1977 1643 134.4 — — — — -94 -5 — 50.8% +0.08 1–10 (9%) 4–5 (44%) 93.7 +0.22
31 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 99.8 +0.49 1978 1661 140.4 — — — — -123 +79 — 50.0% +0.10 6–8 (43%) 6–10 (38%) 98.0 +1.28
32 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40 1979 1583 117.3 — — — — -87 — — 11.8% -2.00 1–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.12
33 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42 1980 1573 101.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–2 — -0.06
36 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86 — 1757 133.1 — — — — -7 +19 -94 44.8% -0.30 34–50 (40%) 45–51 (47%) 99.4 +1.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.