H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kim Warwick vs Wojtek Fibak H2H: 1-0
Kim Warwick holds a 1–0 lead over Wojtek Fibak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kim Warwick leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1982 Denver quarterfinal 6-2 3-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 1982* | Denver | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Kim Warwick | 6-2 3-6 7-6 | Wojtek Fibak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Warwick | #1,294 | #15 | 15 | 1,945 | 290 | 273 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Wojtek Fibak | #566 | #10 | 0 | 2,089 | 520 | 309 | 62.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kim Warwick | Wojtek Fibak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 39–33 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 74–31 | 70.5% | #14 | 2,070 | 0 | 3 |
| 1972 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 60–30 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 |
| 1973 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 60–32 | 65.2% | #21 | 1,895 | 0 | 5 |
| 1974 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 59–22 | 72.8% | #15 | 1,976 | 0 | 7 |
| 1975 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #49 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 58–25 | 69.9% | #14 | 1,941 | 0 | 10 |
| 1976 | 28–32 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #17 | 1,846 | 0 | 11 |
| 1977 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,988 | 0 | 14 |
| 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #41 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,779 | 0 | 14 |
| 1979 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #52 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #45 | 1,727 | 0 | 14 |
| 1980 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,926 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,721 | 0 | 14 |
| 1981 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #29 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #125 | 1,636 | 0 | 14 |
| 1982 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,572 | 0 | 14 |
| 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #570 | 1,573 | 0 | 14 |
| 1984 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #196 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #497 | 1,664 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #600 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |