H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Kristian Pless vs Martin Damm Sr H2H: 0-2

Martin Damm Sr holds a 2–0 lead over Kristian Pless in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martin Damm Sr leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martin Damm Sr won the 2002 Memphis round of 32 6-4 7-6(5).

DEN Age 45 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 2
2 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martin Damm Sr 6-4 7-6(5) Kristian Pless #66 Match data Feb 21, 2002* R32 Memphis ATP International Series Gold modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Martin Damm Sr 6-4 3-6 6-3 Kristian Pless #464 Match data Mar 2, 2000* R32 Copenhagen ATP International Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kristian Pless #939 #65 592 1,712 44 82 34.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Martin Damm Sr 1,731 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Kristian Pless Martin Damm Sr
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1999 1–2 33.3% #458 1,511 0 0
2000 1–4 20.0% #197 1,507 0 0
2001 12–10 54.5% #68 1,662 0 0
2002 15–22 40.5% #82 1,664 0 0
2003 2–5 28.6% #440 1,611 0 0
2004 3–9 25.0% #230 1,553 0 0
2005 0–2 0.0% #160 1,543 0 0
2006 5–10 33.3% #84 1,626 0 0
2007 5–16 23.8% #128 1,509 0 0
2008 0–2 0.0% #158 1,480 0 0

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Kristian Pless Martin Damm Sr
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1999 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 0 1 1 0.0%
2000 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 0 1 1 0.0%
2001 9 6 15 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 2 1 3 66.7%
2002 8 10 18 44.4% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
2003 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 7 11 18 38.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
2004 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 7 12 19 36.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
2005 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 7 13 20 35.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
2006 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1996 15 13 28 53.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5%
2007 3 9 12 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1997 10 13 23 43.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
2008 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
1999 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
2000 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
2002 1 2 3 33.3%
Career 29 47 76 38.2% 7 16 23 30.4% 4 12 16 25.0% 4 7 11 36.4% Career 74 107 181 40.9% 6 28 34 17.6% 22 24 46 47.8% 51 49 100 51.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Kristian Pless Martin Damm Sr
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1999 1512 115.3 +0.37 -0.73 1.081 51.1% +36 33.3% -0.50 -0.24 1989 1492 98.3 0.0% -5.00 -0.08
2000 1507 114.5 -1.58 +0.79 0.687 43.9% +16 27.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 -0.10 1990 1478 98.3 0.0% -2.50 +0.15
2001 1662 127.6 +0.83 -1.40 0.942 48.9% -41 -69 -106 56.0% +0.36 2–1 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 104.5 +0.18 1991 1504 104.7 +57 57.1% +0.57 1–0 0–1 +0.21
2002 1665 129.1 -0.41 -1.13 0.952 49.1% +34 -142 -129 43.8% -0.31 4–10 (29%) 5–10 (33%) 93.2 +0.31 1992 1546 125.4 +65 -88 35.1% -0.91 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) 103.3 +0.26
2003 1611 110.7 +1.63 -3.19 0.959 49.3% +14 36.8% -0.42 1–2 (33%) 0–1 +0.32 1993 1647 128.4 +28 -196 44.8% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 +0.61
2004 1554 115.9 -1.68 -2.74 0.796 46.5% +38 31.4% -1.09 2–2 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 96.4 -0.03 1994 1630 133.5 -23 -172 +21 44.4% -0.32 3–13 (19%) 9–10 (47%) 92.4 -0.61
2005 1543 109.1 +1.45 -2.88 0.857 46.1% 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 -0.01 1995 1619 133.0 +8 42.3% -0.55 9–8 (53%) 11–11 (50%) 102.9 -0.27
2006 1627 114.5 -0.75 -2.22 0.871 47.5% -38 -39 31.6% -1.05 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.3 +0.18 1996 1709 139.5 +35 -23 47.9% -0.08 13–8 (62%) 13–18 (42%) 102.9 +1.26
2007 1509 129.5 +1.72 -2.07 0.922 48.7% +21 +22 -12 31.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 4–10 (29%) 94.1 -0.35 1997 1694 135.4 +35 -281 +7 48.3% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 +0.62
2008 1481 100.6 -2.49 -0.88 0.834 46.4% 20.0% -1.40 0–1 +0.34 1998 1649 132.2 +16 +23 42.9% -0.50 7–7 (50%) 8–11 (42%) 98.6 -0.31
2009 1482 98.0 1999 1578 123.5 +27 -177 +52 39.1% -0.78 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) 90.9 -0.57
2000 1615 127.5 -72 -159 +102 44.2% -0.34 7–3 (70%) 6–9 (40%) 105.2 +0.30
2001 1514 96.3 +91 15.0% -1.90 0–2 +0.77
2002 1525 111.4 +15 37.5% -0.75 1–1 -0.13
Career 1713 126.6 +0.14 -1.77 0.910 48.4% +9 -81 -67 38.9% -0.54 12–25 (32%) 19–34 (36%) 88.9 +0.48 Career 1732 136.6 +17 -170 +36 43.3% -0.43 59–60 (50%) 77–88 (47%) 101.6 +0.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.