H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Kristian Pless vs Noam Okun H2H: 1-1
Kristian Pless and Noam Okun are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kristian Pless leads 1–0 on clay, while Noam Okun leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kristian Pless won the 2002 Houston fourth round 7-6(5) 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
DEN
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2002* | Houston | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Kristian Pless | 7-6(5) 4-6 7-5 | Noam Okun | Match data |
| Jan 3, 2002* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Noam Okun | 6-2 6-4 | Kristian Pless | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristian Pless | #939 | #65 | 592 | 1,709 | 43 | 81 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Noam Okun | #1,046 | #95 | 411 | 1,628 | 20 | 43 | 31.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristian Pless | Noam Okun | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #458 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #68 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2002 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #82 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #440 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #532 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #230 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #128 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #84 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #128 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #141 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #194 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #431 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #355 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |