H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Kristian Pless vs Tuomas Ketola H2H: 1-0
Kristian Pless holds a 1–0 lead over Tuomas Ketola in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kristian Pless leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kristian Pless won the 2001 Tashkent third round 3-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
DEN
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FIN
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2005* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Q2 | Grass | Tuomas Ketola | 6-4 6-3 | Kristian Pless | Match data |
| Sep 13, 2001* | Tashkent | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Kristian Pless | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | Tuomas Ketola | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristian Pless | #939 | #65 | 592 | 1,709 | 43 | 81 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tuomas Ketola | #1,512 | #130 | 360 | 1,598 | 9 | 30 | 23.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristian Pless | Tuomas Ketola | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #458 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #68 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2002 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #82 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2003 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #440 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #230 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #232 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #164 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #84 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #148 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #128 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #246 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #171 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #236 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #430 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |