H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Kyle Edmund vs Benoit Paire H2H: 0-1

Benoit Paire holds a 1–0 lead over Kyle Edmund in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Benoit Paire leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Benoit Paire won the 2016 Estoril Open second round 6-7(4) 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kyle Edmund
Great Britain Age 31 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Benoit Paire
France Age 37 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Benoit Paire #21 6-7(4) 6-3 6-3 Kyle Edmund #89 Match data Apr 29, 2016* R16 Estoril Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kyle Edmund #703 #14 2,330 2,001 114 121 48.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Benoit Paire #862 #18 1,805 1,951 240 294 44.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kyle Edmund Benoit Paire
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2013 1–3 25.0% #376 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2014 0–5 0.0% #194 1,473 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2015 1–5 16.7% #102 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2016 20–19 51.3% #45 1,882 0 0 2010 1–4 20.0% #152 1,586 0 0
22 2017 29–27 51.8% #50 1,875 0 0 2011 5–10 33.3% #95 1,603 0 0
23 2018 37–21 63.8% #14 1,952 0 1 2012 26–26 50.0% #47 1,781 0 0
24 2019 14–22 38.9% #69 1,769 0 1 2013 32–30 51.6% #26 1,786 0 0
25 2020 10–9 52.6% #48 1,763 0 2 2014 10–19 34.5% #118 1,718 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2015 25–17 59.5% #19 1,924 0 1
27 2022 2–3 40.0% #581 1,735 0 2 2016 23–32 41.8% #47 1,716 0 1
28 2023 0–7 0.0% #538 1,653 0 2 2017 31–31 50.0% #41 1,785 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2018 26–28 48.1% #52 1,811 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2019 34–28 54.8% #24 1,818 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2020 8–12 40.0% #28 1,709 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2021 13–28 31.7% #46 1,659 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2022 4–22 15.4% #179 1,594 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2023 0–4 0.0% #117 1,585 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2024 2–3 40.0% #415 1,508 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kyle Edmund Benoit Paire
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2013 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2014 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2016 14 12 26 53.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2017 22 18 40 55.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2011 3 4 7 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2018 21 12 33 63.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2012 9 14 23 39.1% 12 10 22 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4%
24 2019 9 13 22 40.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2013 16 17 33 48.5% 13 10 23 56.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2020 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 7 8 15 46.7% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 12 9 21 57.1% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2022 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 13 20 33 39.4% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2023 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2017 17 18 35 48.6% 8 10 18 44.4% 6 3 9 66.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 17 17 34 50.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 16 20 36 44.4% 15 5 20 75.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 7 9 16 43.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 7 14 21 33.3% 6 12 18 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 3 10 13 23.1% 1 10 11 9.1% 0 2 2 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 78 75 153 51.0% 24 27 51 47.1% 12 19 31 38.7% — 129 165 294 43.9% 87 101 188 46.3% 24 28 52 46.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 230/235 of Kyle Edmund's and 532/534 of Benoit Paire's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kyle Edmund Benoit Paire
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2013 4/4 4.5 2.0 64.2% 73.6% 51.0% 74.3% 14.3% 65.6% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2014 5/5 5.6 2.8 61.2% 68.8% 43.4% 53.2% 11.3% 59.5% 28.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2015 5/6 5.2 2.8 57.8% 62.5% 47.8% 52.4% 25.3% 56.6% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2016 36/39 6.2 2.9 59.3% 71.8% 51.0% 57.8% 44.0% 63.3% 35.1% 2010 5/5 14.0 6.0 52.0% 73.0% 44.6% 60.9% 36.7% 59.4% 32.3%
22 2017 56/56 5.6 2.9 58.3% 74.7% 54.1% 61.2% 42.6% 65.9% 37.6% 2011 15/15 5.7 3.6 51.3% 70.3% 45.8% 46.5% 42.7% 58.3% 36.8%
23 2018 57/58 6.9 2.5 59.6% 75.7% 54.5% 66.1% 40.8% 67.3% 37.9% 2012 52/52 7.4 4.5 51.7% 72.8% 46.8% 55.1% 38.9% 60.4% 39.6%
24 2019 36/36 5.1 2.1 62.2% 72.0% 52.5% 51.4% 42.8% 64.7% 34.1% 2013 62/62 8.7 3.8 52.4% 74.0% 47.2% 56.0% 41.6% 61.4% 38.4%
25 2020 19/19 5.7 2.7 61.2% 74.4% 50.2% 68.7% 36.6% 65.0% 38.0% 2014 29/29 9.9 4.5 51.5% 76.0% 45.2% 59.3% 40.4% 60.3% 35.9%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 42/42 7.5 4.0 52.4% 72.9% 48.6% 57.9% 46.7% 61.2% 38.6%
27 2022 5/5 7.2 3.4 53.3% 73.2% 39.8% 65.6% 63.3% 57.5% 33.7% 2016 53/55 7.9 4.7 49.6% 72.4% 46.1% 56.7% 40.9% 59.3% 37.0%
28 2023 7/7 3.7 3.3 56.8% 63.2% 43.7% 33.7% 31.7% 54.4% 25.2% 2017 62/62 8.3 4.6 52.3% 75.6% 46.2% 56.8% 47.3% 61.5% 38.8%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 54/54 8.9 5.5 51.0% 76.1% 44.4% 54.3% 42.8% 60.4% 38.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 62/62 9.8 6.6 51.7% 78.4% 45.7% 60.2% 41.1% 62.7% 36.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 20/20 9.8 6.2 52.9% 71.6% 43.2% 56.6% 39.1% 58.3% 35.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 41/41 8.5 7.5 52.9% 73.6% 40.1% 57.1% 43.9% 58.0% 35.8%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 26/26 7.4 7.8 50.9% 71.2% 39.3% 49.6% 31.7% 55.6% 34.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 4/4 10.8 9.5 54.2% 71.6% 41.8% 55.9% 33.5% 58.3% 33.3%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 5/5 6.6 7.2 57.5% 73.1% 39.0% 48.0% 37.5% 58.7% 38.4%
Career — 230/235 5.9 2.6 59.6% 73.2% 52.1% 60.1% 40.5% 64.7% 35.9% — 532/534 8.5 5.3 51.8% 74.3% 45.2% 56.2% 41.8% 60.3% 37.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kyle Edmund Benoit Paire
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2012 1500 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2013 1510 104.9 -0.84 -2.06 0.901 48.3% — — +57 22.2% -1.22 — 0–3 (0%) — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2014 1474 106.7 -2.93 -2.24 0.699 44.8% +38 — — 8.3% -2.50 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.07 2008 1471 97.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2015 1587 116.6 -3.20 -1.53 0.745 45.0% — — — 20.0% -1.60 1–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.23 2009 1493 103.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2016 1883 152.7 +0.52 -0.61 0.956 49.6% -23 -173 -355 51.6% -0.02 6–6 (50%) 12–4 (75%) — -0.63 2010 1586 118.3 -2.12 -0.94 0.796 46.5% -23 — — 33.3% -0.89 1–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.04
22 2017 1876 157.4 +2.08 +1.53 1.102 51.8% +2 -87 -353 56.3% +0.53 7–18 (28%) 13–13 (50%) — -0.39 2011 1603 123.4 -3.06 +0.10 0.882 47.5% -3 +27 — 35.0% -0.77 3–1 (75%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.13
23 2018 1952 158.9 +3.43 +1.57 1.159 52.4% -10 -74 -299 60.5% +0.60 9–10 (47%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.07 2012 1782 142.4 -1.71 +1.64 0.998 49.9% -102 -34 -102 49.6% -0.07 9–9 (50%) 11–14 (44%) — -0.08
24 2019 1770 148.4 +0.75 -0.44 0.966 49.4% +37 +36 -119 44.3% -0.26 3–7 (30%) 1–10 (9%) — -0.60 2013 1786 157.4 -1.15 +1.47 0.993 50.0% -35 +83 -99 53.3% +0.10 9–11 (45%) 16–12 (57%) — +1.43
25 2020 1764 146.7 +0.91 +1.13 1.084 51.3% +37 — — 52.1% +0.27 2–3 (40%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.14 2014 1718 134.7 -2.95 -1.19 0.905 48.0% +51 +26 -117 42.3% -0.28 5–7 (42%) 5–13 (28%) — +0.67
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1925 154.1 -1.52 +2.40 0.997 50.1% -34 +9 -319 55.0% +0.20 12–5 (71%) 9–3 (75%) — -0.04
27 2022 1735 110.8 -1.90 +0.25 0.792 45.8% +26 — — 36.4% -1.09 — 1–1 — +0.12 2016 1716 146.7 -3.57 +0.24 0.910 48.0% +10 +122 -135 43.2% -0.58 12–13 (48%) 10–13 (43%) — +2.19
28 2023 1653 115.8 -3.22 -3.72 0.554 40.8% +59 +68 — 6.3% -2.75 0–1 0–1 — -1.04 2017 1785 155.3 -2.05 +2.27 1.008 50.0% -17 +10 -39 51.7% +0.01 5–11 (31%) 17–9 (65%) — +1.95
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1812 153.2 -1.98 +2.17 0.965 49.3% -13 -26 +8 48.6% -0.23 10–11 (48%) 16–12 (57%) — -1.92
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1819 150.0 -1.37 +1.15 0.989 49.8% -72 +114 +30 51.9% +0.04 11–11 (50%) 16–13 (55%) — -0.26
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1710 127.4 -3.57 -0.47 0.857 47.1% -1 +130 — 45.3% -0.36 6–4 (60%) 4–7 (36%) — +1.03
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1659 142.0 -3.78 -1.03 0.851 47.3% +15 +77 — 36.2% -0.96 4–9 (31%) 6–7 (46%) — +1.03
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1594 131.2 -5.62 -1.88 0.767 45.2% +64 +14 — 28.4% -1.51 2–6 (25%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.83
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1585 113.0 -2.53 -0.35 0.797 46.6% — -8 — 25.0% -1.25 0–2 0–2 — -0.19
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1508 101.4 -2.39 -0.60 0.929 48.2% — — — 38.5% -0.85 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.34
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1493 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2002 155.4 +1.34 +0.47 1.016 50.4% +7 -64 -227 50.3% +0.06 28–46 (38%) 45–55 (45%) 88.6 -1.17 — 1951 150.1 -2.39 +0.90 0.942 48.9% -20 +44 -71 46.6% -0.28 91–102 (47%) 120–117 (51%) 103.5 +0.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.