H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Kyle Edmund vs Daniel Munoz de la Nava H2H: 1-0
Kyle Edmund holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Munoz de la Nava in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kyle Edmund leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kyle Edmund won the 2016 Doha fourth round 5-7 6-3 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Great Britain
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2016* | Doha | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Kyle Edmund | 5-7 6-3 7-6(3) | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,002 | 113 | 120 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Daniel Munoz de la Nava | #1,384 | #68 | 732 | 1,761 | 9 | 28 | 24.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kyle Edmund | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,891 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,877 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,958 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #171 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #194 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #351 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |