H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Kyle Edmund vs Donald Young H2H: 0-1
Donald Young holds a 1–0 lead over Kyle Edmund in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Donald Young leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Donald Young won the 2017 Eastbourne third round 6-4 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Great Britain
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2017* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Donald Young | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Kyle Edmund | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,002 | 113 | 120 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Donald Young | #1,350 | #38 | 1,039 | 1,942 | 125 | 187 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kyle Edmund | Donald Young | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #553 | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,380 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #138 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,891 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #39 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,877 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–23 | 17.9% | #190 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,958 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #57 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #48 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #88 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #61 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #248 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #411 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |