H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Kyle Edmund vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 0-3

Fernando Verdasco holds a 3–0 lead over Kyle Edmund in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2019 Wimbledon second round 4-6 4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kyle Edmund
Great Britain Age 31 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 4, 2019* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Fernando Verdasco #37 4-6 4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 6-4 Kyle Edmund #30 Match data
May 14, 2019* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Fernando Verdasco #38 4-6 6-4 6-2 Kyle Edmund #27 Match data
Oct 26, 2018* Vienna ATP 500 R16 Hard Fernando Verdasco #30 6-4 3-6 6-3 Kyle Edmund #14 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kyle Edmund #703 #14 2,330 2,002 113 120 48.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kyle Edmund Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2013 1–3 25.0% #376 1,509 0 0 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 2014 0–5 0.0% #194 1,473 0 0 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 2015 1–5 16.7% #102 1,580 0 0 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 2016 19–18 51.4% #45 1,891 0 0 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2017 29–27 51.8% #50 1,877 0 0 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2018 37–21 63.8% #14 1,958 0 1 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2019 14–22 38.9% #69 1,772 0 1 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 2020 10–9 52.6% #48 1,765 0 2 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3
26 — — — — — — — 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5
27 2022 2–3 40.0% #581 1,736 0 2 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 2023 0–7 0.0% #538 1,654 0 2 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 — — — — — — — 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7