H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Kyle Edmund vs Jared Donaldson H2H: 0-2
Jared Donaldson holds a 2–0 lead over Kyle Edmund in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jared Donaldson leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jared Donaldson won the 2017 Chengdu fourth round 6-0 1-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Great Britain
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 29
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2017* | Chengdu | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jared Donaldson | 6-0 1-6 6-4 | Kyle Edmund | Match data |
| Mar 24, 2017* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Jared Donaldson | 2-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | Kyle Edmund | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,002 | 113 | 120 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jared Donaldson | #966 | #48 | 1,038 | 1,849 | 48 | 62 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kyle Edmund | Jared Donaldson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #105 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,891 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #111 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,877 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #720 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,958 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |