H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Kyle Edmund vs Jiri Vesely H2H: 3-0
Kyle Edmund holds a 3–0 lead over Jiri Vesely in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kyle Edmund leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kyle Edmund won the 2018 Marrakech third round 5-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Great Britain
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
Czechia
Age 33
Left-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2018* | Marrakech | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Kyle Edmund | 5-0 (ret.) | Jiri Vesely | Match data |
| Oct 10, 2017* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Kyle Edmund | 6-3 6-2 | Jiri Vesely | Match data |
| Mar 25, 2016* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Kyle Edmund | 6-4 5-7 7-6(6) | Jiri Vesely | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,002 | 113 | 120 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jiri Vesely | #1,213 | #35 | 1,125 | 1,924 | 129 | 160 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kyle Edmund | Jiri Vesely | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #85 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #66 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,891 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,877 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,958 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #62 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #89 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #105 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #68 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,629 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #292 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |