H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Kyle Edmund vs Kevin Anderson H2H: 1-2
Kevin Anderson holds a 2–1 lead over Kyle Edmund in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Kevin Anderson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kevin Anderson won the 2020 Cincinnati Masters second round 7-6(3) 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Great Britain
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 40
Right-Handed
203 cm / 6'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2020 | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Kevin Anderson | 7-6(3) 4-6 6-3 | Kyle Edmund | Match data |
| Jan 17, 2018* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Kyle Edmund | 6-7(4) 6-3 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Kevin Anderson | Match data |
| Jun 3, 2017* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Kevin Anderson | 6-7(6) 7-6(4) 5-7 6-1 6-4 | Kyle Edmund | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,002 | 113 | 120 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kevin Anderson | #1,151 | #5 | 4,845 | 2,142 | 347 | 251 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kyle Edmund | Kevin Anderson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,891 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,877 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #104 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,958 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #61 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 39–27 | 59.1% | #32 | 1,889 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #37 | 1,859 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #20 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,958 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #12 | 2,046 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #67 | 1,884 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #14 | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #6 | 2,123 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 11–4 | 73.3% | #91 | 2,057 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #81 | 1,964 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #104 | 1,681 | 0 | 7 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #627 | 1,669 | 0 | 7 |