H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Kyle Edmund vs Lukas Rosol H2H: 2-0
Kyle Edmund holds a 2–0 lead over Lukas Rosol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kyle Edmund leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kyle Edmund won the 2016 Nottingham second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Great Britain
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2016* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Kyle Edmund | 6-4 6-3 | Lukas Rosol | Match data |
| Apr 21, 2016* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Kyle Edmund | 7-6(4) 7-6(5) | Lukas Rosol | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,002 | 113 | 120 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Lukas Rosol | #1,777 | #26 | 1,290 | 1,921 | 110 | 148 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kyle Edmund | Lukas Rosol | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,891 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,877 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,958 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #73 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #47 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #31 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #55 | 1,846 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #203 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #142 | 1,703 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #180 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |