H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Kyle Edmund vs Lukas Rosol H2H: 2-0

Kyle Edmund holds a 2–0 lead over Lukas Rosol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kyle Edmund leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kyle Edmund won the 2016 Eastbourne Open first round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kyle Edmund
Great Britain Age 31 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Lukas Rosol
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kyle Edmund #68 6-4 6-3 Lukas Rosol #75 Match data Jun 21, 2016* R64 Eastbourne Open ATP 250 Grass
Kyle Edmund #92 7-6(4) 7-6(5) Lukas Rosol #61 Match data Apr 21, 2016* R32 Tiriac Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kyle Edmund #703 #14 2,330 2,001 114 121 48.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Lukas Rosol #1,777 #26 1,290 1,920 110 150 42.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kyle Edmund Lukas Rosol
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2013 1–3 25.0% #376 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2014 0–5 0.0% #194 1,473 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2015 1–5 16.7% #102 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2016 20–19 51.3% #45 1,882 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #271 1,507 0 0
22 2017 29–27 51.8% #50 1,875 0 0 2008 1–2 33.3% #182 1,536 0 0
23 2018 37–21 63.8% #14 1,952 0 1 2009 0–1 0.0% #148 1,563 0 0
24 2019 14–22 38.9% #69 1,769 0 1 2010 0–2 0.0% #164 1,576 0 0
25 2020 10–9 52.6% #48 1,763 0 2 2011 5–13 27.8% #70 1,577 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2012 17–18 48.6% #73 1,749 0 0
27 2022 2–3 40.0% #581 1,735 0 2 2013 21–25 45.7% #47 1,737 0 1
28 2023 0–7 0.0% #538 1,653 0 2 2014 28–26 51.9% #31 1,787 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2015 19–28 40.4% #55 1,845 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2016 14–23 37.8% #113 1,721 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2017 2–3 40.0% #203 1,670 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2018 2–2 50.0% #142 1,702 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2019 1–3 25.0% #180 1,661 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2020 0–1 0.0% #199 1,658 0 2
36 — — — — — — — 2022 0–2 0.0% #216 1,588 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kyle Edmund Lukas Rosol
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2013 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2014 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2016 14 12 26 53.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2017 22 18 40 55.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2018 21 12 33 63.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2019 9 13 22 40.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2020 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 2 8 10 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 6 10 16 37.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2022 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 14 17 31 45.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2023 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2014 10 15 25 40.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 12 16 28 42.9% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 10 15 25 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 78 75 153 51.0% 24 27 51 47.1% 12 19 31 38.7% — 57 92 149 38.3% 45 45 90 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 230/235 of Kyle Edmund's and 258/260 of Lukas Rosol's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kyle Edmund Lukas Rosol
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2013 4/4 4.5 2.0 64.2% 73.6% 51.0% 74.3% 14.3% 65.6% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2014 5/5 5.6 2.8 61.2% 68.8% 43.4% 53.2% 11.3% 59.5% 28.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2015 5/6 5.2 2.8 57.8% 62.5% 47.8% 52.4% 25.3% 56.6% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2016 36/39 6.2 2.9 59.3% 71.8% 51.0% 57.8% 44.0% 63.3% 35.1% 2007 1/1 1.0 6.0 52.3% 62.2% 48.8% 66.7% 28.6% 55.8% 34.2%
22 2017 56/56 5.6 2.9 58.3% 74.7% 54.1% 61.2% 42.6% 65.9% 37.6% 2008 3/3 2.7 3.7 49.5% 69.2% 42.0% 41.0% 77.8% 55.6% 38.6%
23 2018 57/58 6.9 2.5 59.6% 75.7% 54.5% 66.1% 40.8% 67.3% 37.9% 2009 1/1 10.0 3.0 63.6% 74.3% 40.0% 66.7% 60.0% 61.8% 33.0%
24 2019 36/36 5.1 2.1 62.2% 72.0% 52.5% 51.4% 42.8% 64.7% 34.1% 2010 2/2 4.0 5.0 49.9% 70.6% 44.8% 77.8% 5.0% 57.9% 26.8%
25 2020 19/19 5.7 2.7 61.2% 74.4% 50.2% 68.7% 36.6% 65.0% 38.0% 2011 18/18 7.5 3.9 57.0% 68.7% 45.7% 63.3% 33.5% 59.0% 34.2%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 35/35 7.2 3.1 58.6% 74.4% 50.9% 63.0% 45.9% 64.7% 32.6%
27 2022 5/5 7.2 3.4 53.3% 73.2% 39.8% 65.6% 63.3% 57.5% 33.7% 2013 46/46 6.9 3.3 58.0% 71.9% 48.3% 61.9% 35.5% 62.0% 35.2%
28 2023 7/7 3.7 3.3 56.8% 63.2% 43.7% 33.7% 31.7% 54.4% 25.2% 2014 53/54 6.3 2.7 57.3% 71.5% 49.5% 55.0% 40.6% 62.0% 34.8%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 47/47 5.7 4.1 56.9% 72.2% 49.6% 52.8% 37.2% 62.3% 33.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 36/37 6.9 3.2 60.3% 71.1% 51.0% 64.2% 40.0% 63.0% 31.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 5/5 10.4 4.4 62.4% 80.1% 50.7% 51.4% 37.2% 68.0% 26.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 4/4 8.3 3.5 64.3% 71.7% 50.7% 70.4% 20.0% 64.3% 29.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 4/4 6.5 4.3 64.0% 68.8% 50.0% 48.2% 38.8% 62.0% 30.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 1/1 3.0 4.0 38.1% 81.3% 53.8% 50.0% — 64.3% 20.8%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 2/2 6.0 3.5 72.3% 65.1% 40.9% 47.8% 72.2% 57.7% 29.7%
Career — 230/235 5.9 2.6 59.6% 73.2% 52.1% 60.1% 40.5% 64.7% 35.9% — 258/260 6.6 3.4 58.1% 71.9% 49.3% 58.9% 39.1% 62.4% 33.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kyle Edmund Lukas Rosol
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2012 1500 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2013 1510 104.9 -0.84 -2.06 0.901 48.3% — — +57 22.2% -1.22 — 0–3 (0%) — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2014 1474 106.7 -2.93 -2.24 0.699 44.8% +38 — — 8.3% -2.50 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2015 1587 116.6 -3.20 -1.53 0.745 45.0% — — — 20.0% -1.60 1–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2016 1883 152.7 +0.52 -0.61 0.956 49.6% -23 -173 -355 51.6% -0.02 6–6 (50%) 12–4 (75%) — -0.63 2007 1508 110.5 -1.57 +3.07 0.774 45.7% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.23
22 2017 1876 157.4 +2.08 +1.53 1.102 51.8% +2 -87 -353 56.3% +0.53 7–18 (28%) 13–13 (50%) — -0.39 2008 1536 106.6 -1.01 -0.08 0.870 47.4% — — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.18
23 2018 1952 158.9 +3.43 +1.57 1.159 52.4% -10 -74 -299 60.5% +0.60 9–10 (47%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.07 2009 1563 107.4 +0.04 -2.26 0.865 47.9% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.02
24 2019 1770 148.4 +0.75 -0.44 0.966 49.4% +37 +36 -119 44.3% -0.26 3–7 (30%) 1–10 (9%) — -0.60 2010 1576 107.5 -1.31 -0.97 0.638 44.3% — — — 16.7% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.05
25 2020 1764 146.7 +0.91 +1.13 1.084 51.3% +37 — — 52.1% +0.27 2–3 (40%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.14 2011 1577 125.6 -2.74 -2.58 0.833 47.0% 0 +90 — 33.3% -1.04 2–3 (40%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.09
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1750 140.7 +2.12 -3.63 0.925 49.1% -109 -26 -70 46.1% -0.24 6–4 (60%) 7–13 (35%) — -1.04
27 2022 1735 110.8 -1.90 +0.25 0.792 45.8% +26 — — 36.4% -1.09 — 1–1 — +0.12 2013 1737 143.6 -0.85 -1.68 0.926 49.0% -16 -11 -87 48.3% -0.21 6–9 (40%) 6–9 (40%) — +1.39
28 2023 1653 115.8 -3.22 -3.72 0.554 40.8% +59 +68 — 6.3% -2.75 0–1 0–1 — -1.04 2014 1788 149.9 -1.20 -0.94 0.916 48.7% -81 +76 -127 47.6% -0.40 8–6 (57%) 18–10 (64%) — -1.09
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1846 149.4 -0.94 -1.88 0.879 48.2% -26 -21 -218 44.4% -0.39 8–10 (44%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.23
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1722 143.9 -0.35 -3.49 0.860 47.9% +13 +53 — 40.2% -0.66 7–7 (50%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.96
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1670 114.3 +0.43 -2.44 0.822 47.8% +16 — — 50.0% -0.07 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.08
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1702 116.1 -0.71 -0.20 0.821 47.8% — — — 45.5% -0.55 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -0.52
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1661 113.9 -1.09 -2.40 0.789 46.4% +3 — — 38.5% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.37
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1659 107.1 -0.51 +0.11 0.583 41.1% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.30
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1546 101.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1588 106.8 -2.09 -4.12 0.702 43.9% — — — 28.6% -1.43 0–1 1–1 — +0.05
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1540 92.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2002 155.4 +1.34 +0.47 1.016 50.4% +7 -64 -227 50.3% +0.06 28–46 (38%) 45–55 (45%) 88.6 -1.17 — 1920 139.1 -0.59 -2.12 0.886 48.3% -33 +29 -121 43.7% -0.49 41–47 (47%) 70–66 (51%) 103.0 -1.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.