H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Kyle Edmund vs Malek Jaziri H2H: 2-1
Kyle Edmund holds a 2–1 lead over Malek Jaziri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kyle Edmund leads 2–0 on clay, while Malek Jaziri leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kyle Edmund won the 2018 Rome Masters second round 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Great Britain
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
TUN
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2018* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Kyle Edmund | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Malek Jaziri | Match data |
| Apr 14, 2018* | Marrakech | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Kyle Edmund | 6-2 6-1 | Malek Jaziri | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2015* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Malek Jaziri | 7-6(4) 7-6(5) | Kyle Edmund | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,002 | 113 | 120 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Malek Jaziri | #1,645 | #42 | 1,042 | 1,843 | 83 | 134 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kyle Edmund | Malek Jaziri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,891 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,877 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,958 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #76 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #103 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #58 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #98 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #45 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #201 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #312 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #433 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1645 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |