H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Kyle Edmund vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 1-0

Kyle Edmund holds a 1–0 lead over Marcos Baghdatis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kyle Edmund leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kyle Edmund won the 2017 Atlanta round of 32 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kyle Edmund
Great Britain Age 31 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Marcos Baghdatis
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kyle Edmund #45 6-3 7-5 Marcos Baghdatis #75 Match data Jul 27, 2017* R32 Atlanta ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kyle Edmund #703 #14 2,330 2,001 114 121 48.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 327 274 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kyle Edmund Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2013 1–3 25.0% #376 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2014 0–5 0.0% #194 1,473 0 0 2004 2–2 50.0% #159 1,576 0 0
20 2015 1–5 16.7% #102 1,587 0 0 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,699 0 0
21 2016 20–19 51.3% #45 1,882 0 0 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2017 29–27 51.8% #50 1,875 0 0 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,938 0 2
23 2018 37–21 63.8% #14 1,952 0 1 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,814 0 2
24 2019 14–22 38.9% #69 1,769 0 1 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,784 0 3
25 2020 10–9 52.6% #48 1,763 0 2 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,851 0 4
26 — — — — — — — 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2022 2–3 40.0% #581 1,735 0 2 2012 33–25 56.9% #36 1,908 0 4
28 2023 0–7 0.0% #538 1,653 0 2 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,806 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,704 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,870 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,728 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,743 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kyle Edmund Marcos Baghdatis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2013 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2014 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2005 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
21 2016 14 12 26 53.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2006 22 12 34 64.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2017 22 18 40 55.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2007 23 15 38 60.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 8 2 10 80.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
23 2018 21 12 33 63.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2008 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
24 2019 9 13 22 40.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2009 16 12 28 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2020 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 33 18 51 64.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 18 18 36 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
27 2022 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 24 16 40 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
28 2023 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 14 15 29 48.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 17 13 30 56.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 14 10 24 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 11 11 22 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 78 75 153 51.0% 24 27 51 47.1% 12 19 31 38.7% — — — — — 233 182 415 56.1% 30 50 80 37.5% 55 40 95 57.9% 9 2 11 81.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 230/235 of Kyle Edmund's and 594/601 of Marcos Baghdatis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kyle Edmund Marcos Baghdatis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2013 4/4 4.5 2.0 64.2% 73.6% 51.0% 74.3% 14.3% 65.6% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2014 5/5 5.6 2.8 61.2% 68.8% 43.4% 53.2% 11.3% 59.5% 28.3% 2004 2/4 11.5 7.5 51.4% 71.0% 41.1% 18.3% 61.4% 56.3% 38.1%
20 2015 5/6 5.2 2.8 57.8% 62.5% 47.8% 52.4% 25.3% 56.6% 32.3% 2005 23/23 7.5 2.6 56.7% 73.2% 52.6% 55.8% 51.8% 64.3% 37.5%
21 2016 36/39 6.2 2.9 59.3% 71.8% 51.0% 57.8% 44.0% 63.3% 35.1% 2006 53/53 7.4 3.3 52.5% 74.5% 50.5% 54.0% 44.4% 62.8% 40.2%
22 2017 56/56 5.6 2.9 58.3% 74.7% 54.1% 61.2% 42.6% 65.9% 37.6% 2007 66/66 6.8 2.7 52.6% 75.1% 54.2% 61.3% 46.5% 65.0% 39.2%
23 2018 57/58 6.9 2.5 59.6% 75.7% 54.5% 66.1% 40.8% 67.3% 37.9% 2008 24/24 8.2 3.8 54.0% 77.5% 53.3% 57.0% 35.8% 66.3% 35.2%
24 2019 36/36 5.1 2.1 62.2% 72.0% 52.5% 51.4% 42.8% 64.7% 34.1% 2009 33/34 7.2 3.0 52.8% 75.2% 51.2% 56.2% 43.9% 63.7% 39.4%
25 2020 19/19 5.7 2.7 61.2% 74.4% 50.2% 68.7% 36.6% 65.0% 38.0% 2010 68/68 7.3 2.9 51.3% 75.9% 52.1% 57.6% 43.5% 64.5% 38.6%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 53/53 7.5 2.9 51.3% 76.4% 51.0% 59.2% 46.0% 63.9% 36.7%
27 2022 5/5 7.2 3.4 53.3% 73.2% 39.8% 65.6% 63.3% 57.5% 33.7% 2012 55/58 6.3 3.1 54.7% 73.6% 52.4% 54.6% 43.1% 64.2% 37.9%
28 2023 7/7 3.7 3.3 56.8% 63.2% 43.7% 33.7% 31.7% 54.4% 25.2% 2013 36/36 7.6 4.3 53.0% 75.3% 51.9% 64.0% 39.1% 64.1% 34.4%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 18/18 6.4 4.6 52.0% 74.5% 50.3% 45.3% 45.3% 63.0% 35.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 45/45 7.8 3.6 54.5% 74.1% 51.1% 58.0% 45.4% 63.6% 37.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 49/49 6.0 3.3 52.3% 73.9% 53.6% 58.4% 43.5% 64.0% 36.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 34/34 7.6 3.5 52.0% 76.6% 49.9% 62.7% 39.9% 64.1% 36.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 28/29 9.6 3.5 56.0% 74.9% 50.9% 56.9% 37.7% 64.0% 38.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 7/7 5.7 4.1 55.2% 77.5% 46.0% 56.1% 43.2% 63.4% 37.0%
Career — 230/235 5.9 2.6 59.6% 73.2% 52.1% 60.1% 40.5% 64.7% 35.9% — 594/601 7.3 3.3 53.0% 75.0% 51.8% 57.6% 43.6% 64.1% 37.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kyle Edmund Marcos Baghdatis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2012 1500 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2013 1510 104.9 -0.84 -2.06 0.901 48.3% — — +57 22.2% -1.22 — 0–3 (0%) — -0.13 2003 1485 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2014 1474 106.7 -2.93 -2.24 0.699 44.8% +38 — — 8.3% -2.50 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.07 2004 1576 118.7 -0.69 +1.61 0.871 47.4% +16 — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 2–0 — -0.09
20 2015 1587 116.6 -3.20 -1.53 0.745 45.0% — — — 20.0% -1.60 1–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.23 2005 1700 138.3 +1.75 +0.83 1.048 50.7% +36 — — 49.3% +0.13 4–5 (44%) 8–8 (50%) — -0.74
21 2016 1883 152.7 +0.52 -0.61 0.956 49.6% -23 -173 -355 51.6% -0.02 6–6 (50%) 12–4 (75%) — -0.63 2006 1843 151.4 +0.96 +3.30 1.081 51.5% +9 -291 -70 59.3% +0.45 11–9 (55%) 17–7 (71%) — -1.44
22 2017 1876 157.4 +2.08 +1.53 1.102 51.8% +2 -87 -353 56.3% +0.53 7–18 (28%) 13–13 (50%) — -0.39 2007 1938 150.2 +2.29 +2.86 1.121 52.1% -36 -250 -59 61.7% +0.72 13–6 (68%) 18–16 (53%) — -0.34
23 2018 1952 158.9 +3.43 +1.57 1.159 52.4% -10 -74 -299 60.5% +0.60 9–10 (47%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.07 2008 1814 141.8 +1.75 -0.01 1.045 50.5% +1 — +137 56.3% +0.06 2–5 (29%) 7–3 (70%) — -0.74
24 2019 1770 148.4 +0.75 -0.44 0.966 49.4% +37 +36 -119 44.3% -0.26 3–7 (30%) 1–10 (9%) — -0.60 2009 1785 147.9 +0.73 +2.59 1.086 51.4% +42 — +151 56.4% +0.42 1–6 (14%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.90
25 2020 1764 146.7 +0.91 +1.13 1.084 51.3% +37 — — 52.1% +0.27 2–3 (40%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.14 2010 1852 156.2 +1.70 +2.21 1.087 51.3% +40 -122 -46 59.2% +0.51 12–11 (52%) 16–8 (67%) — -0.06
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1844 157.1 +1.07 +0.51 1.016 50.4% +32 -159 +46 52.2% +0.26 8–11 (42%) 13–14 (48%) — -0.79
27 2022 1735 110.8 -1.90 +0.25 0.792 45.8% +26 — — 36.4% -1.09 — 1–1 — +0.12 2012 1908 155.9 +1.50 +1.16 1.059 50.9% +21 -225 +14 56.4% +0.32 9–6 (60%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.33
28 2023 1653 115.8 -3.22 -3.72 0.554 40.8% +59 +68 — 6.3% -2.75 0–1 0–1 — -1.04 2013 1806 154.0 +1.07 -0.98 0.959 49.3% +63 -182 +5 43.6% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 6–13 (32%) — -2.69
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1705 123.0 -0.60 -0.13 0.951 48.8% +34 — +84 46.8% -0.34 4–6 (40%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.23
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1870 152.8 -0.76 +2.30 1.033 50.6% -3 -251 -6 56.9% +0.42 10–7 (59%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.74
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1884 158.0 +0.22 +1.50 1.027 50.2% +24 -227 -33 52.5% +0.08 6–7 (46%) 12–10 (55%) — -2.18
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1839 144.1 +0.48 -0.05 1.011 50.1% +31 -215 -34 52.1% +0.15 6–1 (86%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.55
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1728 136.9 +0.05 +0.78 1.058 50.5% +55 -175 +46 43.8% -0.13 3–4 (43%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.39
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1743 122.7 -0.99 +0.40 1.010 49.8% +39 — — 50.0% -0.11 2–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.56
Career — 2002 155.4 +1.34 +0.47 1.016 50.4% +7 -64 -227 50.3% +0.06 28–46 (38%) 45–55 (45%) 88.6 -1.17 — 1953 157.5 +0.97 +1.47 1.049 50.7% +23 -204 +4 54.6% +0.27 95–94 (50%) 147–125 (54%) 100.7 -1.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.