H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Kyle Edmund vs Peter Gojowczyk H2H: 2-1
Kyle Edmund holds a 2–1 lead over Peter Gojowczyk in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kyle Edmund leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Peter Gojowczyk won the 2019 Washington quarterfinal 6-3 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Great Britain
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 37
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2019* | Washington | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Peter Gojowczyk | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Kyle Edmund | Match data |
| Oct 4, 2018* | Beijing | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Kyle Edmund | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | Peter Gojowczyk | Match data |
| Jul 28, 2017* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Kyle Edmund | 2-6 6-4 7-5 | Peter Gojowczyk | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,002 | 113 | 120 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Peter Gojowczyk | #1,284 | #39 | 1,175 | 1,885 | 75 | 97 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kyle Edmund | Peter Gojowczyk | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,891 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,877 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,958 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #79 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #194 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #60 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #59 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #117 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #86 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #235 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |