H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Kyle Edmund vs Ryan Harrison H2H: 1-1
Kyle Edmund and Ryan Harrison are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kyle Edmund leads 1–0 on grass, while Ryan Harrison leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kyle Edmund won the 2018 Queen's Club third round 7-6(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Great Britain
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2018* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Kyle Edmund | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Ryan Harrison | Match data |
| Jul 29, 2017* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Ryan Harrison | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | Kyle Edmund | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,002 | 113 | 120 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ryan Harrison | #1,551 | #40 | 1,160 | 1,893 | 117 | 155 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kyle Edmund | Ryan Harrison | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #748 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #79 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #69 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,891 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #100 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,877 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,958 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #112 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #47 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #302 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #479 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #456 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |