H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Kyle Edmund vs Yen-Hsun Lu H2H: 1-0
Kyle Edmund holds a 1–0 lead over Yen-Hsun Lu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kyle Edmund leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kyle Edmund won the 2017 Delray Beach fourth round 6-3 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Great Britain
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2017* | Delray Beach | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Kyle Edmund | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
| Aug 14, 2016* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Kyle Edmund | 2-6 7-6(3) 7-6(4) | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,002 | 113 | 120 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kyle Edmund | Yen-Hsun Lu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,891 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,877 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,958 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |