H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
L. Pimek vs P. Rebolledo H2H: 2-0
L. Pimek holds a 2–0 lead over P. Rebolledo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, L. Pimek leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, L. Pimek won the 1991 Prague third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 62
Right-Handed
195 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CHI
Age 65
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 1991* | Prague | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | L. Pimek | 6-4 6-1 | P. Rebolledo | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1984 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | L. Pimek | 6-0 6-1 | P. Rebolledo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L. Pimek | #1,308 | #21 | 73 | 1,860 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| P. Rebolledo | #608 | #36 | 335 | 1,801 | 91 | 103 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | L. Pimek | P. Rebolledo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #300 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #57 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #125 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #25 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #45 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #34 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #63 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1986 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #71 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #129 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #98 | 1,642 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1988 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #143 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #332 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #140 | 1,541 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #210 | 1,558 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #124 | 1,554 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #249 | 1,441 | 0 | 3 |