H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
L. Wahlgren vs D. Keretic H2H: 0-1
D. Keretic holds a 1–0 lead over L. Wahlgren in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, D. Keretic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, D. Keretic won the 1989 Australian Open first round 4-6 6-2 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 59
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 66
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 1989* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | D. Keretic | 4-6 6-2 6-4 7-6 | L. Wahlgren | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L. Wahlgren | #1,303 | #66 | 323 | 1,608 | 23 | 50 | 31.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| D. Keretic | #837 | #58 | 35 | 1,740 | 87 | 120 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | L. Wahlgren | D. Keretic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #282 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #239 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #206 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #86 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #256 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #170 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #283 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #68 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #248 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #207 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #412 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |