H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Laslo Djere vs Jordan Thompson H2H: 0-1
Jordan Thompson holds a 1–0 lead over Laslo Djere in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jordan Thompson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jordan Thompson won the 2016 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Australia
Age 32
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2016* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Jordan Thompson | 6-3 6-4 7-5 | Laslo Djere | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laslo Djere | #220 | #27 | 1,342 | 1,862 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Jordan Thompson | #309 | #26 | 1,745 | 1,944 | 150 | 172 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laslo Djere | Jordan Thompson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #495 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #88 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #79 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #93 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #94 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #38 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #72 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #57 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #63 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #51 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #70 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #33 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #84 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2024 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #98 | 1,692 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2026 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #220 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #108 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |