H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Laslo Djere vs Juan Ignacio Londero H2H: 1-1
Laslo Djere and Juan Ignacio Londero are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Juan Ignacio Londero won the 2020 Buenos Aires fourth round 6-7(3) 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 32
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2021* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Clay | Juan Ignacio Londero | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Laslo Djere | Match data |
| Feb 14, 2020* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Juan Ignacio Londero | 6-7(3) 6-2 6-1 | Laslo Djere | Match data |
| Feb 8, 2020* | Cordoba | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Laslo Djere | 6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(5) | Juan Ignacio Londero | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laslo Djere | #220 | #27 | 1,342 | 1,862 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Juan Ignacio Londero | #1,011 | #50 | 1,017 | 1,810 | 34 | 49 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laslo Djere | Juan Ignacio Londero | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #495 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #278 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #88 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #93 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2019 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #38 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #57 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #50 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2021 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2022 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #70 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2023 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #33 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #276 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2024 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #98 | 1,692 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #220 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |