H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Laslo Djere vs Malek Jaziri H2H: 2-1
Laslo Djere holds a 2–1 lead over Malek Jaziri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Laslo Djere leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Laslo Djere won the 2022 Marrakech fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
TUN
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2022* | Marrakech | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Laslo Djere | 6-4 6-2 | Malek Jaziri | Match data |
| Mar 1, 2019* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Laslo Djere | 6-3 3-6 7-6(2) | Malek Jaziri | Match data |
| Oct 22, 2018 | Basel | ATP 500 | Q2 | Hard | Laslo Djere | 6-2 6-3 | Malek Jaziri | Match data |
| May 5, 2018* | Istanbul | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Malek Jaziri | 6-3 6-2 | Laslo Djere | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laslo Djere | #220 | #27 | 1,342 | 1,862 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Malek Jaziri | #1,645 | #42 | 1,042 | 1,843 | 83 | 134 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laslo Djere | Malek Jaziri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #495 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #88 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #93 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2019 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #38 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2020 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #57 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2021 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2022 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #70 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #33 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2024 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #98 | 1,692 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #76 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2026 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #220 | 1,649 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #103 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #58 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #98 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #45 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #201 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #312 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #433 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1645 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |