H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Laslo Djere vs Marco Cecchinato H2H: 2-1
Laslo Djere holds a 2–1 lead over Marco Cecchinato in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Laslo Djere leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Laslo Djere won the 2021 Buenos Aires third round 6-7(4) 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Italy
Age 33
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2021* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Laslo Djere | 6-7(4) 6-2 6-3 | Marco Cecchinato | Match data |
| Oct 18, 2020* | Sardinia | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Laslo Djere | 7-6(3) 7-5 | Marco Cecchinato | Match data |
| Jul 21, 2018* | Umag | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Marco Cecchinato | 6-4 6-1 | Laslo Djere | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laslo Djere | #220 | #27 | 1,342 | 1,862 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Marco Cecchinato | #175 | #16 | 2,091 | 1,903 | 79 | 128 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laslo Djere | Marco Cecchinato | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #495 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #88 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #93 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #187 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #38 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #57 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #20 | 1,771 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2021 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2022 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #70 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #80 | 1,764 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2023 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #33 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #100 | 1,679 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2024 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #101 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #98 | 1,692 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #198 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2026 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #220 | 1,649 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,544 | 0 | 3 |