H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Laslo Djere vs Marco Cecchinato H2H: 2-1

Laslo Djere holds a 2–1 lead over Marco Cecchinato in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Laslo Djere leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Laslo Djere won the 2021 Argentina Open first round 6-7(4) 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laslo Djere
Serbia Age 31 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Marco Cecchinato
Italy Age 33 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laslo Djere #60 6-7(4) 6-2 6-3 Marco Cecchinato #89 Match data Mar 4, 2021* R32 Argentina Open ATP 250 Clay
Laslo Djere #74 7-6(3) 7-5 Marco Cecchinato #103 Match data Oct 18, 2020* F Sardinia ATP 250 Clay
Marco Cecchinato #27 6-4 6-1 Laslo Djere #100 Match data Jul 21, 2018* QF Croatia Open Umag ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laslo Djere #206 #27 1,342 1,861 152 164 48.1% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Marco Cecchinato #166 #16 2,091 1,903 79 128 38.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laslo Djere Marco Cecchinato
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2013 0–1 0.0% #495 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2015 0–1 0.0% #186 1,477 0 0 2013 0–1 0.0% #163 1,587 0 0
21 2016 0–1 0.0% #185 1,497 0 0 2014 0–3 0.0% #159 1,586 0 0
22 2017 7–4 63.6% #88 1,670 0 0 2015 0–4 0.0% #90 1,556 0 0
23 2018 11–16 40.7% #93 1,721 0 0 2016 2–10 16.7% #187 1,562 0 0
24 2019 21–22 48.8% #38 1,708 0 1 2017 1–5 16.7% #109 1,559 0 0
25 2020 13–9 59.1% #57 1,769 0 2 2018 23–23 50.0% #20 1,771 0 2
26 2021 23–26 46.9% #52 1,689 0 2 2019 14–25 35.9% #71 1,644 0 3
27 2022 20–24 45.5% #70 1,765 0 2 2020 8–13 38.1% #80 1,762 0 3
28 2023 33–25 56.9% #33 1,815 0 2 2021 16–21 43.2% #100 1,680 0 3
29 2024 10–16 38.5% #115 1,735 0 2 2022 4–7 36.4% #101 1,642 0 3
30 2025 13–14 48.1% #98 1,692 0 3 2023 11–15 42.3% #198 1,609 0 3
31 2026 1–5 16.7% #206 1,639 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #166 1,557 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laslo Djere Marco Cecchinato
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2015 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
22 2017 1 1 2 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 2018 2 9 11 18.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — —
24 2019 2 10 12 16.7% 18 9 27 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2017 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2020 2 5 7 28.6% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 2018 4 11 15 26.7% 17 10 27 63.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2021 5 13 18 27.8% 17 11 28 60.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2019 5 12 17 29.4% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 2022 9 11 20 45.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2020 1 6 7 14.3% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
28 2023 13 11 24 54.2% 16 11 27 59.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2021 1 6 7 14.3% 15 14 29 51.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2024 6 7 13 46.2% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — —
30 2025 0 3 3 0.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 2023 1 3 4 25.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2026 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 40 73 113 35.4% 104 73 177 58.8% 8 18 26 30.8% — 12 43 55 21.8% 65 76 141 46.1% 2 9 11 18.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 313/317 of Laslo Djere's and 205/207 of Marco Cecchinato's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Laslo Djere Marco Cecchinato
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2013 1/1 6.0 2.0 60.9% 64.3% 40.7% 57.1% — 55.1% 20.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2015 1/1 2.0 8.0 65.8% 70.0% 23.1% 60.0% 25.0% 53.9% 31.6% 2013 1/1 2.0 1.0 71.8% 55.4% 50.0% 54.5% 60.0% 53.8% 42.5%
21 2016 1/1 1.0 4.0 60.9% 62.5% 58.3% 42.9% 33.3% 60.9% 27.8% 2014 3/3 2.3 2.3 60.7% 66.3% 48.6% 33.3% 22.9% 59.3% 34.1%
22 2017 11/11 2.5 2.5 59.3% 62.5% 57.4% 54.9% 37.9% 60.9% 38.5% 2015 4/4 4.5 3.5 61.2% 64.6% 42.1% 35.3% 59.0% 55.1% 28.4%
23 2018 27/27 5.7 3.7 58.3% 71.1% 48.3% 57.6% 38.6% 61.5% 35.2% 2016 12/12 2.4 1.9 63.1% 64.4% 47.6% 57.9% 25.6% 58.1% 30.5%
24 2019 42/43 5.5 3.0 60.8% 69.9% 50.0% 54.3% 39.0% 62.1% 35.7% 2017 6/6 2.3 3.3 66.4% 65.3% 37.7% 38.8% 24.6% 56.4% 34.3%
25 2020 22/22 4.5 4.0 59.8% 69.9% 49.8% 47.7% 51.7% 61.4% 38.9% 2018 46/46 5.4 2.6 68.4% 69.2% 48.7% 56.5% 36.6% 62.6% 34.4%
26 2021 49/49 5.0 3.9 59.3% 69.7% 52.2% 56.5% 40.6% 62.3% 37.9% 2019 37/39 4.8 2.7 63.6% 69.9% 49.6% 53.2% 45.5% 62.6% 34.9%
27 2022 44/44 6.2 3.8 61.4% 72.7% 49.9% 56.6% 42.3% 64.0% 34.1% 2020 21/21 4.7 2.3 66.3% 67.3% 50.4% 53.0% 36.5% 61.5% 34.0%
28 2023 58/58 6.0 2.8 61.0% 72.7% 53.4% 64.3% 42.6% 65.1% 36.5% 2021 37/37 4.2 2.6 66.8% 68.5% 51.2% 58.1% 35.7% 62.7% 36.6%
29 2024 26/26 6.6 2.6 63.5% 69.8% 49.6% 62.1% 46.0% 62.6% 36.4% 2022 11/11 2.3 2.0 66.1% 63.5% 45.4% 54.8% 37.9% 57.3% 33.6%
30 2025 25/27 5.0 2.9 62.1% 73.8% 53.6% 59.9% 38.9% 66.2% 36.6% 2023 26/26 3.7 2.8 60.5% 65.3% 50.8% 60.3% 47.8% 59.9% 33.2%
31 2026 6/7 4.7 2.8 62.8% 64.7% 47.5% 64.8% 15.5% 58.5% 30.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 1/1 1.0 2.0 68.0% 53.0% 22.0% 29.0% 40.0% 43.0% 36.0%
Career — 313/317 5.5 3.3 60.7% 70.8% 51.2% 58.0% 41.1% 63.1% 36.2% — 205/207 4.2 2.6 65.3% 67.6% 49.0% 54.9% 38.9% 61.1% 34.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laslo Djere Marco Cecchinato
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2013 1498 105.3 -3.18 +0.84 0.445 41.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1512 99.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2015 1477 102.5 -0.26 -1.65 0.686 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.01 2013 1587 115.3 +3.04 -2.45 0.920 48.3% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.19
21 2016 1498 106.5 -1.90 -0.29 0.710 44.5% — — — 0.0% -2.33 — — — +0.36 2014 1586 117.0 -0.42 -2.53 0.839 46.5% — +93 — 25.0% -1.25 0–2 1–1 — -0.24
22 2017 1671 125.3 -1.52 +0.32 0.984 49.5% — +61 — 61.9% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 4–0 (100%) — -0.02 2015 1556 113.7 -2.52 -4.09 0.631 42.5% — — — 25.0% -2.00 0–2 1–0 — 0.00
23 2018 1721 129.3 -2.30 -0.87 0.915 48.1% -162 +89 — 37.3% -0.84 6–3 (67%) 9–13 (41%) — +0.40 2016 1563 122.3 -2.06 -2.65 0.728 44.8% — +72 — 24.1% -1.76 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.78
24 2019 1708 138.9 -1.43 -0.35 0.944 48.9% -197 +175 -176 46.6% -0.32 8–3 (73%) 11–13 (46%) — +2.21 2017 1559 113.8 -1.75 -1.90 0.787 45.2% — +102 — 20.0% -1.74 1–1 0–2 — +0.15
25 2020 1770 134.9 -0.92 +1.18 1.009 50.3% -255 +176 — 54.7% +0.08 5–3 (63%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.57 2018 1772 145.9 -0.08 -1.47 0.919 49.0% -301 +201 -151 47.1% -0.22 11–4 (73%) 13–11 (54%) — -0.46
26 2021 1689 140.3 -0.56 +0.70 1.004 50.0% -178 +200 -158 47.3% +0.01 11–10 (52%) 6–11 (35%) — +1.15 2019 1645 142.3 -0.33 -1.36 0.932 48.8% -133 +194 -84 38.0% -0.71 3–12 (20%) 8–11 (42%) — +0.50
27 2022 1765 145.4 +0.30 -0.66 0.948 49.1% -90 +78 -252 45.4% -0.04 7–9 (44%) 7–22 (24%) — -1.52 2020 1762 135.4 -0.70 -1.93 0.881 48.1% -218 +106 — 37.0% -0.54 4–2 (67%) 7–5 (58%) — -0.55
28 2023 1816 145.2 +1.17 +0.42 1.047 50.9% -83 +76 -205 55.5% +0.09 6–9 (40%) 16–12 (57%) — +0.65 2021 1681 131.3 -0.53 -0.56 0.983 49.8% -210 +142 — 45.3% -0.33 4–8 (33%) 7–3 (70%) — -0.29
29 2024 1735 129.5 -1.12 0.00 0.974 49.7% +6 +43 — 48.5% 0.00 2–8 (20%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.76 2022 1643 117.9 -3.04 -2.10 0.787 46.4% — +100 — 34.5% -0.76 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.20
30 2025 1693 136.2 +2.35 +0.42 1.080 51.1% -50 +181 -97 50.0% +0.17 5–6 (45%) 5–10 (33%) — -0.05 2023 1610 118.7 -2.90 -2.81 0.827 47.5% -187 +81 — 41.7% -0.82 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) — +0.21
31 2026 1639 108.8 -2.65 -1.55 0.727 44.8% — +184 — 25.0% -1.56 1–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.04 2024 1576 96.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1560 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1557 108.0 +1.66 -2.75 0.632 40.0% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.04
Career — 1862 142.2 -0.31 +0.07 0.980 49.6% -120 +132 -179 47.9% -0.14 53–53 (50%) 71–98 (42%) 94.5 +1.04 — 1904 133.9 -0.98 -1.70 0.883 48.1% -210 +138 -122 39.6% -0.67 29–37 (44%) 45–40 (53%) 102.3 -0.69

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.