H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Laslo Djere vs Taro Daniel H2H: 1-1
Laslo Djere and Taro Daniel are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Laslo Djere won the 2019 Rio de Janeiro fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Japan
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2022 | Basel | ATP 500 | Q2 | Hard | Laslo Djere | 4-6 6-3 7-6(3) | Taro Daniel | Match data |
| Feb 22, 2019* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Laslo Djere | 6-4 6-2 | Taro Daniel | Match data |
| Aug 2, 2018* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Taro Daniel | 6-3 6-2 | Laslo Djere | Match data |
| Oct 26, 2015 | Valencia | ATP 250 | Q1 | Hard | Taro Daniel | 6-0 4-0 (ret.) | Laslo Djere | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laslo Djere | #220 | #27 | 1,342 | 1,862 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Taro Daniel | #194 | #58 | 893 | 1,815 | 81 | 146 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laslo Djere | Taro Daniel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #495 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #177 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #88 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #93 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #38 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #99 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #57 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #77 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2021 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #110 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2022 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #70 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2023 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #33 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2024 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #98 | 1,692 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #75 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2026 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #220 | 1,649 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #84 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,538 | 0 | 1 |