H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Laurence Tieleman vs Alberto Martin H2H: 1-0
Laurence Tieleman holds a 1–0 lead over Alberto Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laurence Tieleman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laurence Tieleman won the 2000 Australian Open first round 6-2 7-6(3) 6-7(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 53
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Laurence Tieleman | 6-2 7-6(3) 6-7(3) 6-3 | Alberto Martin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurence Tieleman | #1,442 | #76 | 625 | 1,652 | 41 | 62 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alberto Martin | #1,023 | #34 | 1,008 | 1,799 | 218 | 267 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laurence Tieleman | Alberto Martin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #226 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #111 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #105 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,721 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #79 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1995 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #240 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #54 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1998 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #107 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #68 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1999 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2000 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #136 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #143 | 1,623 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #100 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #128 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #243 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |