H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 02:40 UTC

Laurence Tieleman vs Andrew Ilie H2H: 1-0

Laurence Tieleman holds a 1–0 lead over Andrew Ilie in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laurence Tieleman leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Laurence Tieleman won the 1999 Newport quarterfinal 7-6(4) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laurence Tieleman
ITA Age 53 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Andrew Ilie
AUS Age 50 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laurence Tieleman #115 7-6(4) 6-4 Andrew Ilie #59 Match data Jul 10, 1999* QF Newport ATP 250 Grass

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Laurence Tieleman #1,442 #76 625 1,653 41 62 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Andrew Ilie #856 #38 997 1,738 89 115 43.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laurence Tieleman Andrew Ilie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1995 5–5 50.0% #161 1,551 0 0
20 1993 4–4 50.0% #148 1,539 0 0 1996 1–3 25.0% #346 1,540 0 0
21 1994 0–1 0.0% #163 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1995 2–4 33.3% #197 1,525 0 0 1998 14–14 50.0% #59 1,587 0 1
23 1996 1–4 20.0% #240 1,483 0 0 1999 28–29 49.1% #54 1,638 0 1
24 1997 0–2 0.0% #297 1,458 0 0 2000 21–27 43.8% #50 1,591 0 2
25 1998 10–7 58.8% #107 1,594 0 0 2001 20–28 41.7% #66 1,620 0 2
26 1999 14–21 40.0% #87 1,605 0 0 2002 0–7 0.0% #464 1,500 0 2
27 2000 10–19 34.5% #136 1,547 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #384 1,456 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laurence Tieleman Andrew Ilie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — —
20 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1998 5 8 13 38.5% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1999 18 15 33 54.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 7 18 25 28.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1998 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 11 15 26 42.3% 9 11 20 45.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 1999 10 13 23 43.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2002 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2000 8 10 18 44.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 19 31 50 38.0% 1 10 11 9.1% 20 18 38 52.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — 41 64 105 39.0% 42 35 77 54.5% 5 11 16 31.2% 1 5 6 16.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 87/102 of Laurence Tieleman's and 172/204 of Andrew Ilie's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Laurence Tieleman Andrew Ilie
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 7/10 3.6 4.4 54.0% 63.9% 51.5% 60.4% 34.1% 58.2% 37.9%
20 1993 8/8 7.0 5.1 50.6% 77.1% 53.4% 68.2% 45.1% 66.3% 33.8% 1996 4/4 3.5 4.3 51.6% 68.5% 44.3% 68.4% 33.4% 57.1% 39.9%
22 1995 5/6 6.4 4.8 48.4% 67.5% 47.5% 63.8% 50.6% 57.1% 28.1% 1998 25/28 3.8 3.4 49.8% 70.9% 51.6% 57.8% 44.9% 61.2% 36.6%
23 1996 3/5 3.3 7.3 47.5% 73.9% 51.1% 61.3% 39.9% 62.1% 34.0% 1999 50/57 4.6 3.2 54.8% 68.1% 51.6% 60.3% 40.2% 60.7% 36.3%
24 1997 2/2 8.0 8.5 54.8% 68.1% 38.6% 46.8% 28.6% 54.8% 33.6% 2000 41/48 5.8 3.5 52.8% 70.0% 49.0% 56.3% 36.5% 59.9% 37.3%
25 1998 17/17 6.9 6.1 51.7% 78.8% 49.4% 58.3% 39.8% 64.2% 33.9% 2001 38/48 4.8 3.1 56.3% 68.1% 49.7% 53.6% 38.7% 59.8% 34.5%
26 1999 32/35 6.6 4.3 54.6% 75.3% 50.7% 54.8% 37.8% 64.1% 33.4% 2002 5/7 3.4 4.8 57.3% 65.0% 40.5% 51.3% 16.2% 54.7% 33.3%
27 2000 20/29 9.6 5.6 49.3% 73.6% 46.7% 54.3% 35.2% 59.9% 31.9% 2003 2/2 7.0 4.0 59.3% 63.1% 33.3% 21.4% 20.0% 50.9% 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laurence Tieleman Andrew Ilie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1552 112.5 -0.36 -0.54 0.906 48.1% — +56 — 46.7% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) +0.71
20 1993 1539 101.3 +0.30 -0.77 1.004 48.9% — — +98 47.6% -0.52 1–1 1–1 +0.78 1996 1541 104.9 +0.54 -0.28 0.931 49.0% — — — 33.3% -1.25 0–1 2–1 (67%) -0.29
21 1994 1533 100.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.80 0–1 2–0 -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 1526 97.9 -1.88 -3.07 0.656 44.0% — — +108 30.8% -1.69 1–0 1–0 +0.43 1998 1587 129.4 +0.09 -1.09 0.944 49.1% -70 +132 — 50.7% 0.00 4–3 (57%) 3–4 (43%) +0.43
23 1996 1484 97.3 -0.40 +0.45 0.896 48.4% — — +155 27.3% -0.91 0–1 0–2 +0.62 1999 1638 126.6 -1.25 -1.32 0.922 48.8% +2 +7 -9 48.0% -0.28 12–8 (60%) 8–8 (50%) +2.44
24 1997 1459 103.0 -1.61 -3.02 0.744 44.8% — — — 28.6% -1.43 0–1 — +0.08 2000 1592 130.9 -1.56 -0.90 0.931 48.9% -49 +204 -39 48.3% -0.32 5–10 (33%) 13–9 (59%) -0.25
25 1998 1594 123.4 +1.29 -2.10 0.947 50.0% -107 — +163 53.7% +0.07 5–4 (56%) 5–2 (71%) +0.28 2001 1621 131.7 -1.47 -2.30 0.859 47.6% -4 +65 — 43.0% -0.56 10–9 (53%) 11–10 (52%) -1.24
26 1999 1605 122.2 +1.18 -3.84 0.930 48.7% -38 — +94 45.3% -0.59 3–7 (30%) 7–8 (47%) +1.09 2002 1501 90.4 -3.88 -1.57 0.735 44.2% +40 — — 5.9% -3.12 — 1–2 (33%) +0.68
27 2000 1548 109.7 -1.89 -4.30 0.796 46.5% +22 -109 +70 37.9% -0.71 2–2 (50%) 5–8 (38%) +1.40 2003 1456 95.5 -2.41 -1.74 0.509 37.7% — — — 16.7% -2.17 — 0–1 +0.17
28 2001 1532 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1503 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1653 115.4 +0.12 -3.11 0.882 48.1% -24 -109 +118 42.8% -0.61 12–17 (41%) 21–21 (50%) +4.41 — 1739 129.5 -1.19 -1.36 0.901 48.3% -21 +97 -17 45.1% -0.47 33–33 (50%) 40–37 (52%) +1.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.