H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Laurence Tieleman vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 1-1

Laurence Tieleman and Cedric Pioline are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Laurence Tieleman won the 1999 Hong Kong Open round of 32 2-6 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laurence Tieleman
ITA Age 53 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laurence Tieleman #86 2-6 6-1 6-4 Cedric Pioline #21 Match data Apr 8, 1999* R32 Hong Kong Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Cedric Pioline #18 4-6 7-6(6) 6-4 Laurence Tieleman #118 Match data Sep 18, 1998* R16 Tashkent ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laurence Tieleman #1,442 #76 625 1,653 41 62 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,984 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 1 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laurence Tieleman Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1993 4–4 50.0% #148 1,539 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,482 0 0
21 1994 0–1 0.0% #163 1,533 0 0 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1995 2–4 33.3% #197 1,525 0 0 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1996 1–4 20.0% #240 1,483 0 0 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,849 0 0
24 1997 0–2 0.0% #297 1,458 0 0 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1998 10–7 58.8% #107 1,594 0 0 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,768 0 0
26 1999 14–21 40.0% #87 1,605 0 0 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,761 0 0
27 2000 10–19 34.5% #136 1,547 0 0 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,808 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,831 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,765 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,796 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,763 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,658 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,619 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laurence Tieleman Cedric Pioline
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1991 6 6 12 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1992 13 10 23 56.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5%
24 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 19 9 28 67.9% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 7 20 65.0%
25 1998 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 15 11 26 57.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
26 1999 10 13 23 43.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5%
27 2000 8 10 18 44.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1996 12 7 19 63.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 15 13 28 53.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 5 15 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 20 16 36 55.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 16 10 26 61.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 4 5 9 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 19 31 50 38.0% 1 10 11 9.1% 20 18 38 52.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — 146 118 264 55.3% 109 93 202 54.0% 46 29 75 61.3% 69 61 130 53.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 87/102 of Laurence Tieleman's and 560/651 of Cedric Pioline's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Laurence Tieleman Cedric Pioline
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1993 8/8 7.0 5.1 50.6% 77.1% 53.4% 68.2% 45.1% 66.3% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 5/6 6.4 4.8 48.4% 67.5% 47.5% 63.8% 50.6% 57.1% 28.1% 1991 40/41 3.5 3.4 59.0% 68.7% 51.3% 60.4% 46.4% 61.6% 38.4%
23 1996 3/5 3.3 7.3 47.5% 73.9% 51.1% 61.3% 39.9% 62.1% 34.0% 1992 53/58 5.8 3.7 57.0% 74.5% 46.4% 59.3% 41.4% 62.6% 36.9%
24 1997 2/2 8.0 8.5 54.8% 68.1% 38.6% 46.8% 28.6% 54.8% 33.6% 1993 68/78 5.7 3.0 59.8% 73.8% 52.0% 60.8% 40.6% 65.1% 39.4%
25 1998 17/17 6.9 6.1 51.7% 78.8% 49.4% 58.3% 39.8% 64.2% 33.9% 1994 44/57 4.5 3.3 60.1% 70.1% 48.9% 53.4% 42.1% 61.7% 39.9%
26 1999 32/35 6.6 4.3 54.6% 75.3% 50.7% 54.8% 37.8% 64.1% 33.4% 1995 44/51 4.9 3.8 57.9% 72.7% 48.2% 53.6% 37.8% 62.4% 37.6%
27 2000 20/29 9.6 5.6 49.3% 73.6% 46.7% 54.3% 35.2% 59.9% 31.9% 1996 53/59 6.0 3.2 55.9% 75.1% 51.7% 62.1% 44.4% 64.9% 39.6%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 51/62 5.9 3.5 60.9% 73.7% 51.1% 61.5% 42.4% 64.7% 38.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 56/64 5.4 3.3 58.6% 73.5% 50.4% 59.3% 47.1% 63.8% 38.3%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 54/65 6.0 4.6 54.4% 75.4% 49.2% 62.1% 42.4% 63.4% 36.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 46/51 8.2 4.8 52.7% 78.8% 51.3% 60.8% 41.8% 65.5% 39.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 31/39 8.3 4.6 52.5% 73.2% 51.4% 63.6% 40.7% 63.1% 36.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 20/26 5.7 4.4 51.2% 71.3% 48.3% 45.7% 32.5% 60.3% 33.6%
Career — 87/103 7.3 5.3 51.9% 75.1% 49.3% 57.2% 38.9% 62.7% 32.9% — 560/671 5.8 3.7 57.1% 73.7% 50.1% 59.3% 42.2% 63.5% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laurence Tieleman Cedric Pioline
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 1993 1539 101.3 +0.30 -0.77 1.004 48.9% — — +98 47.6% -0.52 1–1 1–1 — +0.78 1989 1483 114.0 — — — — — +7 — 12.5% -1.88 0–1 — — -0.41
21 1994 1533 100.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.80 0–1 2–0 — -0.18 1990 1484 124.4 — — — — +14 +43 — 34.9% -0.47 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 100.1 +0.10
22 1995 1526 97.9 -1.88 -3.07 0.656 44.0% — — +108 30.8% -1.69 1–0 1–0 — +0.41 1991 1665 135.0 +1.05 -0.51 1.002 50.2% -79 -6 — 50.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) 101.5 -0.32
23 1996 1484 97.3 -0.40 +0.45 0.896 48.4% — — +155 27.3% -0.91 0–1 0–2 — +0.53 1992 1849 149.9 +1.29 -1.12 0.985 50.1% -31 -113 -257 52.3% +0.22 10–11 (48%) 10–13 (43%) 101.4 -1.91
24 1997 1459 103.0 -1.61 -3.02 0.744 44.8% — — — 28.6% -1.43 0–1 — — +0.07 1993 1937 156.7 +3.18 +1.96 1.128 52.1% +8 -173 -173 60.8% +0.75 16–11 (59%) 19–19 (50%) 100.8 -4.16
25 1998 1594 123.4 +1.29 -2.10 0.947 50.0% -107 — +163 53.7% +0.07 5–4 (56%) 5–2 (71%) 107.0 +0.20 1994 1768 141.9 +0.19 +1.74 1.042 50.9% +34 -22 -59 51.3% +0.05 12–15 (44%) 11–8 (58%) 94.5 -0.27
26 1999 1605 122.2 +1.18 -3.84 0.930 48.7% -38 — +94 45.3% -0.59 3–7 (30%) 7–8 (47%) 99.6 +1.02 1995 1762 147.6 +1.13 +0.42 1.001 49.8% -23 +16 +10 50.8% -0.06 4–9 (31%) 12–7 (63%) 100.1 -3.16
27 2000 1548 109.7 -1.89 -4.30 0.796 46.5% +23 -109 +70 37.9% -0.71 2–2 (50%) 5–8 (38%) 98.2 +1.41 1996 1809 154.8 +2.69 +2.35 1.129 52.1% -33 +87 +32 63.1% +0.93 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 101.9 -1.10
28 2001 1533 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1832 150.4 +2.57 +1.89 1.093 51.3% -28 +52 +117 57.1% +0.51 14–11 (56%) 9–10 (47%) 100.8 -2.00
29 2002 1503 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1765 148.9 +1.69 +0.86 1.058 51.0% +5 +162 +116 56.6% +0.30 12–10 (55%) 15–14 (52%) 96.7 -0.97
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1797 143.0 +1.68 -0.71 0.989 50.0% -26 -11 +162 55.2% +0.07 9–13 (41%) 25–10 (71%) 101.1 -2.23
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1764 148.1 +2.89 +1.87 1.144 52.4% -10 +168 +138 60.6% +0.75 8–9 (47%) 15–13 (54%) 99.3 +0.89
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1658 131.9 +0.83 -1.42 0.999 50.1% +19 +151 +176 46.7% -0.27 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 96.8 -0.75
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1620 134.1 -0.60 -1.51 0.847 46.8% +33 +134 +147 35.1% -0.91 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 94.1 -2.76
Career — 1653 115.4 +0.12 -3.11 0.882 48.1% -24 -109 +118 42.8% -0.61 12–17 (41%) 21–21 (50%) 102.1 +4.16 — 1984 152.3 +1.77 +0.70 1.047 50.8% -10 +32 +46 54.2% +0.27 114–123 (48%) 149–132 (53%) 98.5 -2.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.