Laurence Tieleman
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | 2 | 2 | 4 | Sep 16, 1999 | H2H |
| Vincent Spadea | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 5, 1999 | H2H |
| Byron Black | 1 | 1 | 2 | Oct 20, 2000 | H2H |
| Harel Levy | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 14, 2000 | H2H |
| David Prinosil | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 17, 2000 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Laurence Tieleman holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Elsner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laurence Tieleman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laurence Tieleman won the 2000 Shanghai Masters round of 32 6-3 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurence Tieleman | 6-3 3-6 6-1 | Daniel Elsner | Match data | Oct 19, 2000* | R32 | Shanghai Masters | ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurence Tieleman | #1,442 | #76 | 625 | 1,653 | 41 | 62 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daniel Elsner | #1,377 | #92 | 448 | 1,563 | 8 | 27 | 22.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laurence Tieleman | Daniel Elsner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #608 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #310 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #240 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #311 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1998 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #107 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #165 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #274 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #136 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Laurence Tieleman | Daniel Elsner | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2002 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1997 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1998 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2004 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1999 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2005 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 19 | 31 | 50 | 38.0% | 1 | 10 | 11 | 9.1% | 20 | 18 | 38 | 52.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 7 | 20 | 27 | 25.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 87/102 of Laurence Tieleman's and 32/35 of Daniel Elsner's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Laurence Tieleman | Daniel Elsner | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2/3 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 52.8% | 69.1% | 36.1% | 62.5% | 37.5% | 53.9% | 35.4% |
| 20 | 1993 | 8/8 | 7.0 | 5.1 | 50.6% | 77.1% | 53.4% | 68.2% | 45.1% | 66.3% | 33.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 9/9 | 4.2 | 3.4 | 54.0% | 65.2% | 49.7% | 61.8% | 52.7% | 58.3% | 36.9% |
| 22 | 1995 | 5/6 | 6.4 | 4.8 | 48.4% | 67.5% | 47.5% | 63.8% | 50.6% | 57.1% | 28.1% | 2001 | 8/10 | 2.8 | 7.0 | 48.2% | 65.2% | 38.8% | 46.5% | 31.9% | 51.9% | 31.8% |
| 23 | 1996 | 3/5 | 3.3 | 7.3 | 47.5% | 73.9% | 51.1% | 61.3% | 39.9% | 62.1% | 34.0% | 2002 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 60.3% | 61.4% | 34.5% | 14.3% | 50.0% | 50.7% | 46.6% |
| 24 | 1997 | 2/2 | 8.0 | 8.5 | 54.8% | 68.1% | 38.6% | 46.8% | 28.6% | 54.8% | 33.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1998 | 17/17 | 6.9 | 6.1 | 51.7% | 78.8% | 49.4% | 58.3% | 39.8% | 64.2% | 33.9% | 2004 | 10/10 | 2.4 | 4.4 | 57.5% | 56.1% | 38.5% | 48.0% | 29.8% | 48.2% | 31.2% |
| 26 | 1999 | 32/35 | 6.6 | 4.3 | 54.6% | 75.3% | 50.7% | 54.8% | 37.8% | 64.1% | 33.4% | 2005 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 57.8% | 56.7% | 56.5% | 65.8% | 55.6% | 56.5% | 40.3% |
| 27 | 2000 | 20/29 | 9.6 | 5.6 | 49.3% | 73.6% | 46.7% | 54.3% | 35.2% | 59.9% | 31.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 87/103 | 7.3 | 5.3 | 51.9% | 75.1% | 49.3% | 57.2% | 38.9% | 62.7% | 32.9% | — | 32/35 | 2.8 | 4.6 | 54.0% | 62.0% | 42.6% | 52.4% | 39.5% | 52.9% | 34.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Laurence Tieleman | Daniel Elsner | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1482 | 111.8 | +0.39 | -2.54 | 0.768 | 45.6% | — | +47 | — | 0.0% | -2.17 | — | — | — | -0.25 |
| 20 | 1993 | 1539 | 101.3 | +0.30 | -0.77 | 1.004 | 48.9% | — | — | +98 | 47.6% | -0.52 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 1533 | 100.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.80 | 0–1 | 2–0 | — | -0.18 | 2000 | 1513 | 119.4 | -1.00 | -0.38 | 0.885 | 48.2% | +2 | +48 | — | 45.5% | -0.73 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.21 |
| 22 | 1995 | 1526 | 97.9 | -1.88 | -3.07 | 0.656 | 44.0% | — | — | +108 | 30.8% | -1.69 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.41 | 2001 | 1441 | 108.7 | -4.20 | -3.90 | 0.661 | 42.5% | — | +54 | — | 21.4% | -2.11 | 1–1 | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.03 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1484 | 97.3 | -0.40 | +0.45 | 0.896 | 48.4% | — | — | +155 | 27.3% | -0.91 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.53 | 2002 | 1435 | 103.4 | -1.44 | -1.20 | 0.944 | 48.6% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.05 |
| 24 | 1997 | 1459 | 103.0 | -1.61 | -3.02 | 0.744 | 44.8% | — | — | — | 28.6% | -1.43 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1998 | 1594 | 123.4 | +1.29 | -2.10 | 0.947 | 50.0% | -107 | — | +163 | 53.7% | +0.07 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–2 (71%) | — | +0.20 | 2004 | 1463 | 110.4 | -7.22 | -3.13 | 0.602 | 40.4% | +15 | +81 | — | 30.0% | -1.85 | 1–1 | 3–1 (75%) | — | +0.11 |
| 26 | 1999 | 1605 | 122.2 | +1.18 | -3.84 | 0.930 | 48.7% | -38 | — | +94 | 45.3% | -0.59 | 3–7 (30%) | 7–8 (47%) | — | +1.02 | 2005 | 1472 | 103.4 | +0.30 | -1.08 | 0.926 | 48.8% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.60 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.23 |
| 27 | 2000 | 1548 | 109.7 | -1.89 | -4.30 | 0.796 | 46.5% | +23 | -109 | +70 | 37.9% | -0.71 | 2–2 (50%) | 5–8 (38%) | — | +1.41 | 2006 | 1459 | 96.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 1533 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 1503 | 95.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1653 | 115.4 | +0.12 | -3.11 | 0.882 | 48.1% | -24 | -109 | +118 | 42.8% | -0.61 | 12–17 (41%) | 21–21 (50%) | 102.1 | +4.16 | — | 1564 | 116.1 | -3.59 | -2.32 | 0.728 | 44.2% | +9 | +60 | — | 29.8% | -1.55 | 5–5 (50%) | 6–4 (60%) | 104.6 | +0.63 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | 2 | 2 | 4 | Sep 16, 1999 | H2H |
| Vincent Spadea | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 5, 1999 | H2H |
| Byron Black | 1 | 1 | 2 | Oct 20, 2000 | H2H |
| Harel Levy | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 14, 2000 | H2H |
| David Prinosil | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 17, 2000 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alberto Martin | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 30, 2005 | H2H |
| Fernando Vicente | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 12, 2002 | H2H |
| Fabio Fognini | 1 | 0 | 1 | Sep 29, 2005 | H2H |
| Alex Calatrava | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 30, 2004 | H2H |
| Arnaud Di Pasquale | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 16, 2004 | H2H |