H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Laurence Tieleman vs David Prinosil H2H: 0-2
David Prinosil holds a 2–0 lead over Laurence Tieleman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Prinosil leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 2000 Washington third round 6-1 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 53
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2000* | Washington | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | David Prinosil | 6-1 5-7 6-3 | Laurence Tieleman | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1999* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | David Prinosil | 6-3 6-3 | Laurence Tieleman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurence Tieleman | #1,442 | #76 | 625 | 1,652 | 41 | 62 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laurence Tieleman | David Prinosil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #240 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1998 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #107 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1999 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2000 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #136 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 |