Laurence Tieleman
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | 2 | 2 | 4 | Sep 16, 1999 | H2H |
| Vincent Spadea | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 5, 1999 | H2H |
| Byron Black | 1 | 1 | 2 | Oct 20, 2000 | H2H |
| Harel Levy | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 14, 2000 | H2H |
| David Prinosil | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 17, 2000 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-10-23 00:00 UTC
Jan-Michael Gambill holds a 1–0 lead over Laurence Tieleman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan-Michael Gambill leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan-Michael Gambill won the 2000 Los Angeles Open round of 16 7-6(2) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Michael Gambill | 7-6(2) 6-2 | Laurence Tieleman | Match data | Jul 28, 2000* | R16 | Los Angeles Open | ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurence Tieleman | #1,442 | #76 | 625 | 1,653 | 41 | 62 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,949 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laurence Tieleman | Jan-Michael Gambill | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #240 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,759 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1998 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #107 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1999 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2000 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #136 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,558 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,568 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,504 | 0 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Laurence Tieleman | Jan-Michael Gambill | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 23 | 13 | 36 | 63.9% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 1995 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 20 | 15 | 35 | 57.1% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 23 | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 20 | 17 | 37 | 54.1% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 1997 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 29 | 13 | 42 | 69.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 1998 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2002 | 24 | 16 | 40 | 60.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 1999 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2003 | 20 | 17 | 37 | 54.1% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 15 | 18 | 33 | 45.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 19 | 31 | 50 | 38.0% | 1 | 10 | 11 | 9.1% | 20 | 18 | 38 | 52.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | 160 | 126 | 286 | 55.9% | 10 | 32 | 42 | 23.8% | 23 | 21 | 44 | 52.3% | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 87/102 of Laurence Tieleman's and 105/109 of Jan-Michael Gambill's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Laurence Tieleman | Jan-Michael Gambill | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | 1993 | 8/8 | 7.0 | 5.1 | 50.6% | 77.1% | 53.4% | 68.2% | 45.1% | 66.3% | 33.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 5/6 | 6.4 | 4.8 | 48.4% | 67.5% | 47.5% | 63.8% | 50.6% | 57.1% | 28.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1996 | 3/5 | 3.3 | 7.3 | 47.5% | 73.9% | 51.1% | 61.3% | 39.9% | 62.1% | 34.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1997 | 2/2 | 8.0 | 8.5 | 54.8% | 68.1% | 38.6% | 46.8% | 28.6% | 54.8% | 33.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1998 | 17/17 | 6.9 | 6.1 | 51.7% | 78.8% | 49.4% | 58.3% | 39.8% | 64.2% | 33.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1999 | 32/35 | 6.6 | 4.3 | 54.6% | 75.3% | 50.7% | 54.8% | 37.8% | 64.1% | 33.4% | 2003 | 43/47 | 10.1 | 3.1 | 56.5% | 75.0% | 47.9% | 60.7% | 48.3% | 63.4% | 36.0% |
| 27 | 2000 | 20/29 | 9.6 | 5.6 | 49.3% | 73.6% | 46.7% | 54.3% | 35.2% | 59.9% | 31.9% | 2004 | 43/43 | 11.7 | 3.1 | 59.1% | 76.0% | 47.7% | 57.9% | 38.7% | 64.3% | 34.3% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 15/15 | 12.3 | 3.9 | 56.6% | 76.7% | 45.9% | 58.6% | 27.7% | 63.3% | 32.1% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2/2 | 11.5 | 7.0 | 47.8% | 73.2% | 44.1% | 59.7% | 35.0% | 57.0% | 39.4% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2/2 | 9.5 | 5.5 | 58.7% | 79.4% | 39.2% | 37.5% | 20.8% | 62.8% | 26.7% |
| Career | — | 87/103 | 7.3 | 5.3 | 51.9% | 75.1% | 49.3% | 57.2% | 38.9% | 62.7% | 32.9% | — | 105/392 | 11.1 | 3.4 | 57.5% | 75.7% | 47.3% | 58.8% | 40.7% | 63.6% | 34.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Laurence Tieleman | Jan-Michael Gambill | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1487 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.04 |
| 20 | 1993 | 1539 | 101.3 | +0.30 | -0.77 | 1.004 | 48.9% | — | — | +98 | 47.6% | -0.52 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.78 | 1997 | 1520 | 116.3 | — | — | — | — | +18 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.17 | 1–0 | 3–1 (75%) | — | -0.59 |
| 21 | 1994 | 1533 | 100.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.80 | 0–1 | 2–0 | — | -0.18 | 1998 | 1755 | 144.7 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -222 | -139 | 53.4% | +0.32 | 13–4 (76%) | 11–12 (48%) | 111.1 | +0.72 |
| 22 | 1995 | 1526 | 97.9 | -1.88 | -3.07 | 0.656 | 44.0% | — | — | +108 | 30.8% | -1.69 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.41 | 1999 | 1763 | 145.0 | — | — | — | — | +37 | -263 | -154 | 51.2% | +0.26 | 8–11 (42%) | 10–9 (53%) | 102.4 | -2.53 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1484 | 97.3 | -0.40 | +0.45 | 0.896 | 48.4% | — | — | +155 | 27.3% | -0.91 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.53 | 2000 | 1819 | 143.8 | — | — | — | — | -27 | -296 | -44 | 56.3% | +0.60 | 10–10 (50%) | 10–17 (37%) | 96.8 | -1.79 |
| 24 | 1997 | 1459 | 103.0 | -1.61 | -3.02 | 0.744 | 44.8% | — | — | — | 28.6% | -1.43 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.07 | 2001 | 1759 | 150.9 | — | — | — | — | +67 | -256 | -39 | 61.9% | +0.81 | 8–6 (57%) | 11–10 (52%) | 99.4 | +0.99 |
| 25 | 1998 | 1594 | 123.4 | +1.29 | -2.10 | 0.947 | 50.0% | -107 | — | +163 | 53.7% | +0.07 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–2 (71%) | 107.0 | +0.20 | 2002 | 1756 | 148.6 | — | — | — | — | +48 | -275 | -49 | 51.9% | +0.44 | 11–10 (52%) | 11–14 (44%) | 92.3 | -0.54 |
| 26 | 1999 | 1605 | 122.2 | +1.18 | -3.84 | 0.930 | 48.7% | -38 | — | +94 | 45.3% | -0.59 | 3–7 (30%) | 7–8 (47%) | 99.6 | +1.02 | 2003 | 1644 | 133.1 | +0.95 | -1.36 | 0.983 | 50.0% | +72 | -213 | +27 | 48.2% | +0.07 | 5–6 (45%) | 9–9 (50%) | 96.5 | +1.55 |
| 27 | 2000 | 1548 | 109.7 | -1.89 | -4.30 | 0.796 | 46.5% | +22 | -109 | +70 | 37.9% | -0.71 | 2–2 (50%) | 5–8 (38%) | 98.2 | +1.41 | 2004 | 1596 | 125.6 | +0.40 | -1.44 | 0.961 | 49.5% | +33 | -178 | +70 | 44.1% | -0.30 | 3–7 (30%) | 13–11 (54%) | 98.0 | +1.48 |
| 28 | 2001 | 1533 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1559 | 116.9 | -1.32 | -3.12 | 0.876 | 47.9% | +9 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.92 | 2–2 (50%) | 4–3 (57%) | 101.5 | +0.61 |
| 29 | 2002 | 1503 | 95.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1569 | 105.0 | -1.55 | +1.41 | 0.916 | 48.6% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.60 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.02 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1505 | 103.5 | -0.27 | -2.33 | 0.719 | 44.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.75 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.01 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1506 | 100.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1508 | 103.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1653 | 115.4 | +0.12 | -3.11 | 0.882 | 48.1% | -24 | -109 | +118 | 42.8% | -0.61 | 12–17 (41%) | 21–21 (50%) | 102.1 | +4.16 | — | 1949 | 145.6 | +0.33 | -1.61 | 0.952 | 49.4% | +35 | -250 | -44 | 51.3% | +0.24 | 62–56 (53%) | 82–87 (49%) | 100.1 | -0.01 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | 2 | 2 | 4 | Sep 16, 1999 | H2H |
| Vincent Spadea | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 5, 1999 | H2H |
| Byron Black | 1 | 1 | 2 | Oct 20, 2000 | H2H |
| Harel Levy | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 14, 2000 | H2H |
| David Prinosil | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 17, 2000 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andre Agassi | 2 | 11 | 13 | Feb 14, 2004 | H2H |
| Sjeng Schalken | 6 | 3 | 9 | Oct 16, 2003 | H2H |
| Justin Gimelstob | 4 | 4 | 8 | Jan 6, 2005 | H2H |
| Tim Henman | 3 | 4 | 7 | Aug 4, 2006 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 4 | 3 | 7 | Jul 25, 2002 | H2H |