H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Laurence Tieleman vs Jim Courier H2H: 1-1

Laurence Tieleman and Jim Courier are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Laurence Tieleman won the 2000 Memphis round of 32 7-6(2) 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laurence Tieleman
ITA Age 53 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Jim Courier
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laurence Tieleman #97 7-6(2) 6-0 Jim Courier #38 Match data Feb 17, 2000* R32 Memphis ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Jim Courier #69 6-7(5) 7-5 6-1 Laurence Tieleman #94 Match data Feb 19, 1999* R16 Memphis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laurence Tieleman #1,442 #76 625 1,653 41 62 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,216 489 223 68.7% 4 5 0 5 9 23

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laurence Tieleman Jim Courier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,879 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,862 0 1
20 1993 4–4 50.0% #148 1,539 0 0 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,049 1 4
21 1994 0–1 0.0% #163 1,533 0 0 1992 68–16 81.0% #1 2,074 3 9
22 1995 2–4 33.3% #197 1,525 0 0 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14
23 1996 1–4 20.0% #240 1,483 0 0 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,890 4 14
24 1997 0–2 0.0% #297 1,458 0 0 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,989 4 18
25 1998 10–7 58.8% #107 1,594 0 0 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,852 4 19
26 1999 14–21 40.0% #87 1,605 0 0 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22
27 2000 10–19 34.5% #136 1,547 0 0 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,737 4 23
28 — — — — — — — 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23
29 — — — — — — — 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laurence Tieleman Jim Courier
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 19 10 29 65.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 16 8 24 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5%
20 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1991 37 8 45 82.2% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
21 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 36 6 42 85.7% 15 2 17 88.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 7 22 68.2%
22 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1993 39 9 48 81.3% 12 1 13 92.3% 6 1 7 85.7% 1 6 7 14.3%
23 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1994 17 8 25 68.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
24 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 49 12 61 80.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0%
25 1998 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 10 7 17 58.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
26 1999 10 13 23 43.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 26 10 36 72.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 2000 8 10 18 44.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1998 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 14 12 26 53.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 19 31 50 38.0% 1 10 11 9.1% 20 18 38 52.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — 285 114 399 71.4% 108 45 153 70.6% 26 17 43 60.5% 70 47 117 59.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 87/102 of Laurence Tieleman's and 473/566 of Jim Courier's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Laurence Tieleman Jim Courier
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1993 8/8 7.0 5.1 50.6% 77.1% 53.4% 68.2% 45.1% 66.3% 33.8% 1991 60/74 5.4 2.2 63.3% 73.8% 56.0% 62.7% 44.2% 67.4% 41.3%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 69/84 5.3 2.4 60.8% 77.6% 55.0% 64.3% 45.3% 68.7% 41.7%
22 1995 5/6 6.4 4.8 48.4% 67.5% 47.5% 63.8% 50.6% 57.1% 28.1% 1993 61/75 4.9 2.7 60.8% 75.1% 56.5% 67.7% 45.3% 67.9% 41.7%
23 1996 3/5 3.3 7.3 47.5% 73.9% 51.1% 61.3% 39.9% 62.1% 34.0% 1994 54/62 4.1 2.5 61.6% 75.3% 53.5% 59.7% 45.0% 66.8% 40.8%
24 1997 2/2 8.0 8.5 54.8% 68.1% 38.6% 46.8% 28.6% 54.8% 33.6% 1995 66/79 5.4 2.9 62.0% 75.7% 54.4% 67.1% 47.4% 67.5% 40.1%
25 1998 17/17 6.9 6.1 51.7% 78.8% 49.4% 58.3% 39.8% 64.2% 33.9% 1996 40/45 5.9 3.2 60.1% 74.7% 53.8% 57.4% 43.4% 66.6% 39.6%
26 1999 32/35 6.6 4.3 54.6% 75.3% 50.7% 54.8% 37.8% 64.1% 33.4% 1997 43/53 4.8 3.0 59.8% 73.7% 52.8% 54.7% 45.2% 65.1% 38.2%
27 2000 20/29 9.6 5.6 49.3% 73.6% 46.7% 54.3% 35.2% 59.9% 31.9% 1998 31/36 4.9 2.2 64.3% 71.9% 52.8% 60.1% 36.6% 64.9% 36.9%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 41/49 6.0 2.5 66.0% 75.0% 55.7% 62.7% 39.4% 68.4% 36.5%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 8/9 6.3 2.8 59.3% 72.8% 52.6% 60.6% 42.6% 64.7% 34.7%
Career — 87/103 7.3 5.3 51.9% 75.1% 49.3% 57.2% 38.9% 62.7% 32.9% — 473/712 5.2 2.6 61.9% 75.0% 54.6% 62.5% 44.1% 67.2% 39.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laurence Tieleman Jim Courier
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1484 102.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.12
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1712 137.9 — — — — +4 -126 — 58.0% +0.40 5–6 (45%) 9–2 (82%) 104.7 -0.43
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1879 152.8 — — — — -3 -151 — 59.7% +0.64 7–10 (41%) 12–7 (63%) 102.2 -3.51
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1863 156.8 — — — — +8 -32 -251 63.3% +1.10 8–8 (50%) 9–9 (50%) 97.9 -0.68
20 1993 1539 101.3 +0.30 -0.77 1.004 48.9% — — +98 47.6% -0.52 1–1 1–1 — +0.78 1991 2049 168.0 +6.14 +3.91 1.266 54.2% +16 -86 -347 71.0% +1.28 14–5 (74%) 12–9 (57%) 106.5 -2.20
21 1994 1533 100.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.80 0–1 2–0 — -0.18 1992 2075 169.6 +6.83 +4.55 1.332 54.9% +17 +15 -351 74.4% +1.70 12–5 (71%) 24–11 (69%) 105.2 -1.89
22 1995 1526 97.9 -1.88 -3.07 0.656 44.0% — — +108 30.8% -1.69 1–0 1–0 — +0.41 1993 1959 164.0 +6.33 +3.71 1.299 54.3% -24 +192 -55 73.5% +1.61 9–7 (56%) 15–12 (56%) 95.7 -1.11
23 1996 1484 97.3 -0.40 +0.45 0.896 48.4% — — +155 27.3% -0.91 0–1 0–2 — +0.53 1994 1890 155.5 +5.14 +2.68 1.228 53.4% +9 +222 -1 66.7% +1.16 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) 90.0 +0.52
24 1997 1459 103.0 -1.61 -3.02 0.744 44.8% — — — 28.6% -1.43 0–1 — — +0.07 1995 1990 160.9 +5.29 +3.10 1.233 53.6% +22 +69 -186 71.5% +1.26 10–8 (56%) 26–14 (65%) 102.8 -0.63
25 1998 1594 123.4 +1.29 -2.10 0.947 50.0% -107 — +163 53.7% +0.07 5–4 (56%) 5–2 (71%) 107.0 +0.20 1996 1852 152.7 +4.18 +1.56 1.183 52.8% +59 +140 -53 60.7% +0.83 4–7 (36%) 12–11 (52%) 93.2 -0.33
26 1999 1605 122.2 +1.18 -3.84 0.930 48.7% -38 — +94 45.3% -0.59 3–7 (30%) 7–8 (47%) 99.6 +1.02 1997 1828 150.6 +2.66 +1.74 1.095 51.4% +66 +101 -50 62.0% +0.60 8–11 (42%) 12–10 (55%) 92.2 -1.90
27 2000 1548 109.7 -1.89 -4.30 0.796 46.5% +23 -109 +70 37.9% -0.71 2–2 (50%) 5–8 (38%) 98.2 +1.41 1998 1737 137.2 +2.52 -1.01 1.053 50.7% +53 +134 — 51.1% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 97.8 +0.91
28 2001 1533 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1795 135.6 +4.87 -0.80 1.155 52.2% -5 +9 -45 56.8% +0.45 12–5 (71%) 20–11 (65%) 110.4 +0.59
29 2002 1503 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1737 117.5 +0.53 -1.12 0.982 49.4% -2 — — 48.0% -0.44 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 +0.33
Career — 1653 115.4 +0.12 -3.11 0.882 48.1% -24 -109 +118 42.8% -0.61 12–17 (41%) 21–21 (50%) 102.1 +4.16 — 2217 162.1 +5.11 +2.51 1.217 53.3% +16 +52 -127 65.7% +1.03 104–89 (54%) 174–120 (59%) 100.1 -1.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.