Laurence Tieleman
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | 2 | 2 | 4 | Sep 16, 1999 | H2H |
| Vincent Spadea | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 5, 1999 | H2H |
| Byron Black | 1 | 1 | 2 | Oct 20, 2000 | H2H |
| Harel Levy | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 14, 2000 | H2H |
| David Prinosil | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 17, 2000 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC
Laurence Tieleman vs Nicolas Thomann
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Laurence Tieleman vs Nicolas Thomann.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Thomann | 6-1 6-2 | Laurence Tieleman | Match data | Aug 26, 2002 | Q1 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurence Tieleman | #1,442 | #76 | 625 | 1,653 | 41 | 62 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nicolas Thomann | #806 | #106 | 350 | 1,641 | 14 | 25 | 35.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laurence Tieleman | Nicolas Thomann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1996 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #240 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #107 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1999 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #136 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #139 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #223 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #139 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #384 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #433 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Laurence Tieleman | Nicolas Thomann | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 20 | 1993 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1997 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 1998 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1999 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 2000 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 19 | 31 | 50 | 38.0% | 1 | 10 | 11 | 9.1% | 20 | 18 | 38 | 52.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 87/102 of Laurence Tieleman's and 37/39 of Nicolas Thomann's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Laurence Tieleman | Nicolas Thomann | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | 1993 | 8/8 | 7.0 | 5.1 | 50.6% | 77.1% | 53.4% | 68.2% | 45.1% | 66.3% | 33.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 5/6 | 6.4 | 4.8 | 48.4% | 67.5% | 47.5% | 63.8% | 50.6% | 57.1% | 28.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1996 | 3/5 | 3.3 | 7.3 | 47.5% | 73.9% | 51.1% | 61.3% | 39.9% | 62.1% | 34.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1997 | 2/2 | 8.0 | 8.5 | 54.8% | 68.1% | 38.6% | 46.8% | 28.6% | 54.8% | 33.6% | 1997 | 2/2 | 11.5 | 4.0 | 61.2% | 76.9% | 57.7% | 70.5% | 7.1% | 69.4% | 28.7% |
| 25 | 1998 | 17/17 | 6.9 | 6.1 | 51.7% | 78.8% | 49.4% | 58.3% | 39.8% | 64.2% | 33.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1999 | 32/35 | 6.6 | 4.3 | 54.6% | 75.3% | 50.7% | 54.8% | 37.8% | 64.1% | 33.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 20/29 | 9.6 | 5.6 | 49.3% | 73.6% | 46.7% | 54.3% | 35.2% | 59.9% | 31.9% | 2000 | 4/4 | 5.3 | 2.0 | 56.3% | 76.7% | 56.9% | 78.9% | 29.5% | 68.1% | 32.9% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 6/7 | 10.2 | 4.0 | 57.1% | 73.5% | 46.3% | 59.1% | 31.9% | 62.5% | 34.1% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 5/6 | 11.0 | 3.8 | 58.5% | 74.4% | 54.9% | 52.1% | 29.0% | 66.5% | 34.9% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 10/10 | 5.6 | 4.0 | 53.2% | 79.1% | 53.0% | 60.3% | 39.4% | 66.6% | 37.0% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 5/5 | 5.8 | 3.2 | 54.4% | 74.3% | 49.6% | 71.0% | 28.6% | 62.7% | 26.5% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3/3 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 58.9% | 74.0% | 55.7% | 38.5% | 47.8% | 64.6% | 36.6% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 51.8% | 60.8% | 51.2% | 52.8% | 5.6% | 56.2% | 33.4% |
| Career | — | 87/103 | 7.3 | 5.3 | 51.9% | 75.1% | 49.3% | 57.2% | 38.9% | 62.7% | 32.9% | — | 37/39 | 7.3 | 3.3 | 55.9% | 75.1% | 52.5% | 60.8% | 31.4% | 65.0% | 33.7% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Laurence Tieleman | Nicolas Thomann | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 20 | 1993 | 1539 | 101.3 | +0.30 | -0.77 | 1.004 | 48.9% | — | — | +98 | 47.6% | -0.52 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 1533 | 100.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.80 | 0–1 | 2–0 | — | -0.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 1526 | 97.9 | -1.88 | -3.07 | 0.656 | 44.0% | — | — | +108 | 30.8% | -1.69 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1996 | 1484 | 97.3 | -0.40 | +0.45 | 0.896 | 48.4% | — | — | +155 | 27.3% | -0.91 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1997 | 1459 | 103.0 | -1.61 | -3.02 | 0.744 | 44.8% | — | — | — | 28.6% | -1.43 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.07 | 1997 | 1493 | 112.7 | -3.14 | +3.57 | 0.936 | 48.5% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.33 |
| 25 | 1998 | 1594 | 123.4 | +1.29 | -2.10 | 0.947 | 50.0% | -107 | — | +163 | 53.7% | +0.07 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–2 (71%) | — | +0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1999 | 1605 | 122.2 | +1.18 | -3.84 | 0.930 | 48.7% | -38 | — | +94 | 45.3% | -0.59 | 3–7 (30%) | 7–8 (47%) | — | +1.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 1548 | 109.7 | -1.89 | -4.30 | 0.796 | 46.5% | +23 | -109 | +70 | 37.9% | -0.71 | 2–2 (50%) | 5–8 (38%) | — | +1.41 | 2000 | 1535 | 119.3 | +1.01 | -0.41 | 1.032 | 50.5% | +30 | — | — | 55.6% | -0.11 | 0–1 | 2–0 | — | -0.24 |
| 28 | 2001 | 1533 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1510 | 108.4 | +0.92 | -1.21 | 0.910 | 48.6% | +33 | -12 | — | 36.8% | -0.84 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.28 |
| 29 | 2002 | 1503 | 95.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1618 | 119.2 | +1.85 | -1.64 | 1.044 | 50.2% | -26 | — | — | 36.8% | -0.84 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.09 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1606 | 115.0 | +1.21 | -0.34 | 1.110 | 51.4% | +34 | — | — | 66.7% | +0.71 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.65 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1541 | 106.6 | -0.24 | -2.35 | 0.710 | 45.3% | +102 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.50 | 0–2 | 3–1 (75%) | — | -0.36 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1545 | 109.8 | -1.02 | -0.29 | 1.033 | 49.7% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.17 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.09 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1488 | 97.2 | -3.61 | -1.79 | 0.761 | 43.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.13 |
| Career | — | 1653 | 115.4 | +0.12 | -3.11 | 0.882 | 48.1% | -24 | -109 | +118 | 42.8% | -0.61 | 12–17 (41%) | 21–21 (50%) | 102.1 | +4.16 | — | 1641 | 120.3 | +0.36 | -0.80 | 0.963 | 49.2% | +32 | -12 | — | 42.1% | -0.65 | 3–9 (25%) | 10–8 (56%) | 96.8 | -0.33 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Nicolas Thomann
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Federer | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 30, 2004 | H2H |
| Nicolas Kiefer | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 31, 2003 | H2H |
| Mark Philippoussis | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 16, 1997 | H2H |
| Philipp Kohlschreiber | 0 | 1 | 1 | Oct 26, 2006 | H2H |
| Greg Rusedski | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 16, 2006 | H2H |