Laurence Tieleman
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | 2 | 2 | 4 | Sep 16, 1999 | H2H |
| Vincent Spadea | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 5, 1999 | H2H |
| Byron Black | 1 | 1 | 2 | Oct 20, 2000 | H2H |
| Harel Levy | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 14, 2000 | H2H |
| David Prinosil | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 17, 2000 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC
Laurence Tieleman holds a 1–0 lead over Taylor Dent in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laurence Tieleman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laurence Tieleman won the 1999 US Open round of 128 6-4 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurence Tieleman | 6-4 7-5 6-2 | Taylor Dent | Match data | Sep 1, 1999* | R128 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurence Tieleman | #1,442 | #76 | 625 | 1,653 | 41 | 62 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Taylor Dent | #979 | #21 | 1,345 | 1,910 | 152 | 140 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laurence Tieleman | Taylor Dent | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #410 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #181 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #124 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1995 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 28–12 | 70.0% | #33 | 1,889 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #240 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,759 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #29 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1998 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #107 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #574 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1999 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #136 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #865 | 1,673 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #118 | 1,777 | 0 | 4 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Laurence Tieleman | Taylor Dent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 13 | 13 | 26 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 18 | 5 | 23 | 78.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 5 | 0 | 5 | 100.0% |
| 23 | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 25 | 16 | 41 | 61.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 1997 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 24 | 15 | 39 | 61.5% | — | — | — | — | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 25 | 1998 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2006 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1999 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 19 | 31 | 50 | 38.0% | 1 | 10 | 11 | 9.1% | 20 | 18 | 38 | 52.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | 113 | 101 | 214 | 52.8% | 4 | 12 | 16 | 25.0% | 29 | 23 | 52 | 55.8% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 87/102 of Laurence Tieleman's and 277/292 of Taylor Dent's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Laurence Tieleman | Taylor Dent | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 4/4 | 5.8 | 5.5 | 51.6% | 71.1% | 47.8% | 52.0% | 15.8% | 60.1% | 32.5% |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2/2 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 52.4% | 58.4% | 52.8% | 38.6% | 50.0% | 55.6% | 16.3% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 9/10 | 7.7 | 5.7 | 55.0% | 73.1% | 47.0% | 59.7% | 32.1% | 61.8% | 32.4% |
| 20 | 1993 | 8/8 | 7.0 | 5.1 | 50.6% | 77.1% | 53.4% | 68.2% | 45.1% | 66.3% | 33.8% | 2001 | 22/23 | 7.2 | 5.5 | 53.3% | 77.2% | 48.9% | 52.3% | 35.8% | 63.6% | 37.4% |
| 21 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 31/37 | 7.0 | 4.4 | 59.7% | 72.5% | 53.0% | 54.4% | 47.5% | 64.5% | 38.6% |
| 22 | 1995 | 5/6 | 6.4 | 4.8 | 48.4% | 67.5% | 47.5% | 63.8% | 50.6% | 57.1% | 28.1% | 2003 | 39/40 | 8.5 | 6.3 | 55.1% | 78.7% | 52.1% | 64.4% | 46.6% | 66.7% | 40.0% |
| 23 | 1996 | 3/5 | 3.3 | 7.3 | 47.5% | 73.9% | 51.1% | 61.3% | 39.9% | 62.1% | 34.0% | 2004 | 51/57 | 6.4 | 5.7 | 59.9% | 73.2% | 49.5% | 60.1% | 47.7% | 63.7% | 37.7% |
| 24 | 1997 | 2/2 | 8.0 | 8.5 | 54.8% | 68.1% | 38.6% | 46.8% | 28.6% | 54.8% | 33.6% | 2005 | 54/54 | 8.1 | 6.6 | 54.3% | 78.7% | 49.9% | 60.4% | 40.5% | 65.7% | 38.2% |
| 25 | 1998 | 17/17 | 6.9 | 6.1 | 51.7% | 78.8% | 49.4% | 58.3% | 39.8% | 64.2% | 33.9% | 2006 | 5/5 | 7.8 | 5.0 | 59.6% | 76.5% | 44.0% | 50.7% | 37.9% | 63.6% | 32.9% |
| 26 | 1999 | 32/35 | 6.6 | 4.3 | 54.6% | 75.3% | 50.7% | 54.8% | 37.8% | 64.1% | 33.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 20/29 | 9.6 | 5.6 | 49.3% | 73.6% | 46.7% | 54.3% | 35.2% | 59.9% | 31.9% | 2008 | 2/2 | 6.0 | 7.5 | 60.2% | 69.7% | 44.4% | 39.8% | 51.1% | 59.6% | 35.2% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 27/27 | 7.9 | 5.9 | 58.3% | 77.2% | 46.3% | 56.8% | 43.8% | 64.1% | 34.7% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 31/31 | 7.8 | 5.9 | 56.0% | 74.5% | 46.9% | 59.1% | 42.8% | 62.3% | 34.6% |
| Career | — | 87/103 | 7.3 | 5.3 | 51.9% | 75.1% | 49.3% | 57.2% | 38.9% | 62.7% | 32.9% | — | 277/292 | 7.5 | 5.8 | 56.6% | 75.7% | 49.5% | 58.5% | 43.1% | 64.3% | 37.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Laurence Tieleman | Taylor Dent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1493 | 99.7 | -1.26 | -1.61 | 0.814 | 45.7% | +33 | — | — | 12.5% | -2.75 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.32 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1465 | 96.9 | -3.78 | -2.62 | 0.368 | 39.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.20 | — | — | — | +0.21 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1529 | 121.3 | +0.19 | -0.70 | 0.847 | 47.1% | -45 | — | — | 30.0% | -0.75 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–4 (0%) | 96.9 | -0.36 |
| 20 | 1993 | 1539 | 101.3 | +0.30 | -0.77 | 1.004 | 48.9% | — | — | +98 | 47.6% | -0.52 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.78 | 2001 | 1629 | 135.5 | +1.76 | +1.11 | 1.026 | 50.3% | -54 | — | +38 | 47.4% | -0.09 | 2–4 (33%) | 6–5 (55%) | 101.3 | -0.88 |
| 21 | 1994 | 1533 | 100.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.80 | 0–1 | 2–0 | — | -0.18 | 2002 | 1689 | 132.9 | +1.18 | +0.85 | 1.087 | 51.5% | -39 | — | +71 | 56.8% | +0.38 | 3–7 (30%) | 9–8 (53%) | 97.4 | +2.03 |
| 22 | 1995 | 1526 | 97.9 | -1.88 | -3.07 | 0.656 | 44.0% | — | — | +108 | 30.8% | -1.69 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.41 | 2003 | 1889 | 141.1 | +3.77 | +2.59 | 1.202 | 53.1% | +34 | -446 | -112 | 68.5% | +0.98 | 4–3 (57%) | 15–8 (65%) | 104.5 | -0.53 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1484 | 97.3 | -0.40 | +0.45 | 0.896 | 48.4% | — | — | +155 | 27.3% | -0.91 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.53 | 2004 | 1759 | 136.0 | +0.62 | +1.01 | 1.040 | 50.8% | +38 | -302 | +19 | 53.7% | +0.19 | 9–7 (56%) | 12–13 (48%) | 99.0 | +1.76 |
| 24 | 1997 | 1459 | 103.0 | -1.61 | -3.02 | 0.744 | 44.8% | — | — | — | 28.6% | -1.43 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.07 | 2005 | 1786 | 148.2 | +2.55 | +1.76 | 1.112 | 51.9% | +20 | — | +62 | 61.1% | +0.69 | 7–6 (54%) | 14–9 (61%) | 105.2 | +0.10 |
| 25 | 1998 | 1594 | 123.4 | +1.29 | -2.10 | 0.947 | 50.0% | -107 | — | +163 | 53.7% | +0.07 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–2 (71%) | 107.0 | +0.20 | 2006 | 1715 | 112.2 | +0.47 | -2.19 | 0.903 | 47.7% | 0 | — | — | 36.4% | -0.55 | 0–2 | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.05 |
| 26 | 1999 | 1605 | 122.2 | +1.18 | -3.84 | 0.930 | 48.7% | -38 | — | +94 | 45.3% | -0.59 | 3–7 (30%) | 7–8 (47%) | 99.6 | +1.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 1548 | 109.7 | -1.89 | -4.30 | 0.796 | 46.5% | +23 | -109 | +70 | 37.9% | -0.71 | 2–2 (50%) | 5–8 (38%) | 98.2 | +1.41 | 2008 | 1673 | 99.9 | -1.58 | -0.41 | 0.872 | 47.8% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.27 |
| 28 | 2001 | 1533 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1731 | 134.4 | -0.29 | -1.60 | 0.968 | 49.6% | +28 | — | +79 | 45.8% | -0.22 | 4–5 (44%) | 8–4 (67%) | 97.8 | +1.07 |
| 29 | 2002 | 1503 | 95.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1777 | 141.2 | -0.60 | -0.78 | 0.919 | 48.7% | +7 | -290 | +11 | 42.3% | -0.45 | 4–7 (36%) | 6–5 (55%) | 97.5 | -1.86 |
| Career | — | 1653 | 115.4 | +0.12 | -3.11 | 0.882 | 48.1% | -24 | -109 | +118 | 42.8% | -0.61 | 12–17 (41%) | 21–21 (50%) | 102.1 | +4.16 | — | 1911 | 143.3 | +1.28 | +0.73 | 1.037 | 50.7% | +9 | -344 | +24 | 52.8% | +0.16 | 34–46 (43%) | 71–61 (54%) | 97.1 | +0.72 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | 2 | 2 | 4 | Sep 16, 1999 | H2H |
| Vincent Spadea | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 5, 1999 | H2H |
| Byron Black | 1 | 1 | 2 | Oct 20, 2000 | H2H |
| Harel Levy | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 14, 2000 | H2H |
| David Prinosil | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 17, 2000 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Blake | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 22, 2010 | H2H |
| Lleyton Hewitt | 1 | 5 | 6 | Sep 4, 2005 | H2H |
| Ivan Ljubicic | 3 | 2 | 5 | Oct 29, 2010 | H2H |
| Andy Roddick | 1 | 4 | 5 | Nov 3, 2005 | H2H |
| Robby Ginepri | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jul 24, 2005 | H2H |