Laurence Tieleman
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | 2 | 2 | 4 | Sep 16, 1999 | H2H |
| Vincent Spadea | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 5, 1999 | H2H |
| Byron Black | 1 | 1 | 2 | Oct 20, 2000 | H2H |
| Harel Levy | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 14, 2000 | H2H |
| David Prinosil | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 17, 2000 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC
Todd Martin holds a 1–0 lead over Laurence Tieleman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Todd Martin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 1999 Canadian Open round of 32 5-7 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Martin | 5-7 6-3 6-4 | Laurence Tieleman | Match data | Aug 5, 1999* | R32 | Canadian Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurence Tieleman | #1,442 | #76 | 625 | 1,653 | 41 | 62 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Todd Martin | #145 | #4 | 2,969 | 2,064 | 398 | 223 | 64.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 8 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laurence Tieleman | Todd Martin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #269 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #134 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #87 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #13 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #240 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #10 | 1,945 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1998 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #107 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1999 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #81 | 1,913 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2000 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #136 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #16 | 1,998 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,914 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #55 | 1,862 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #57 | 1,816 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #47 | 1,785 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #68 | 1,842 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,688 | 0 | 8 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Laurence Tieleman | Todd Martin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 1994 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 1995 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 21 | 12 | 33 | 63.6% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% |
| 23 | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 22 | 8 | 30 | 73.3% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 10 | 1 | 11 | 90.9% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% |
| 24 | 1997 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 25 | 10 | 35 | 71.4% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% |
| 25 | 1998 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1996 | 29 | 10 | 39 | 74.4% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% |
| 26 | 1999 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1997 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 27 | 2000 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 26 | 12 | 38 | 68.4% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 30 | 11 | 41 | 73.2% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 17 | 11 | 28 | 60.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 19 | 31 | 50 | 38.0% | 1 | 10 | 11 | 9.1% | 20 | 18 | 38 | 52.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | 227 | 122 | 349 | 65.0% | 64 | 42 | 106 | 60.4% | 59 | 25 | 84 | 70.2% | 48 | 34 | 82 | 58.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Laurence Tieleman | Todd Martin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1516 | 114.1 | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | — | 40.0% | 0.00 | 2–0 | 0–4 (0%) | — | +0.50 |
| 20 | 1993 | 1539 | 101.3 | +0.30 | -0.77 | 1.004 | 48.9% | — | — | +98 | 47.6% | -0.52 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.78 | 1991 | 1652 | 125.4 | — | — | — | — | -62 | -40 | -7 | 55.8% | +0.56 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–3 (50%) | 100.0 | +1.12 |
| 21 | 1994 | 1533 | 100.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.80 | 0–1 | 2–0 | — | -0.18 | 1992 | 1724 | 141.4 | — | — | — | — | -19 | -110 | -46 | 55.8% | +0.54 | 4–9 (31%) | 8–8 (50%) | 97.1 | +0.21 |
| 22 | 1995 | 1526 | 97.9 | -1.88 | -3.07 | 0.656 | 44.0% | — | — | +108 | 30.8% | -1.69 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.41 | 1993 | 1887 | 155.8 | — | — | — | — | -16 | -193 | -64 | 62.4% | +0.78 | 10–9 (53%) | 16–17 (48%) | 100.9 | -0.69 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1484 | 97.3 | -0.40 | +0.45 | 0.896 | 48.4% | — | — | +155 | 27.3% | -0.91 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.53 | 1994 | 1945 | 157.2 | — | — | — | — | -18 | -177 | +80 | 64.0% | +0.94 | 19–8 (70%) | 26–17 (60%) | 107.1 | -1.38 |
| 24 | 1997 | 1459 | 103.0 | -1.61 | -3.02 | 0.744 | 44.8% | — | — | — | 28.6% | -1.43 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.07 | 1995 | 1913 | 152.5 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -141 | +46 | 62.5% | +0.71 | 11–4 (73%) | 20–12 (63%) | 108.7 | -0.11 |
| 25 | 1998 | 1594 | 123.4 | +1.29 | -2.10 | 0.947 | 50.0% | -107 | — | +163 | 53.7% | +0.07 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–2 (71%) | 107.0 | +0.20 | 1996 | 1923 | 161.1 | — | — | — | — | +26 | -122 | +82 | 66.3% | +1.07 | 11–10 (52%) | 15–12 (56%) | 98.3 | -1.56 |
| 26 | 1999 | 1605 | 122.2 | +1.18 | -3.84 | 0.930 | 48.7% | -38 | — | +94 | 45.3% | -0.59 | 3–7 (30%) | 7–8 (47%) | 99.6 | +1.02 | 1997 | 1914 | 152.5 | — | — | — | — | +27 | — | — | 63.3% | +0.53 | 2–4 (33%) | 6–3 (67%) | 97.1 | -1.34 |
| 27 | 2000 | 1548 | 109.7 | -1.89 | -4.30 | 0.796 | 46.5% | +23 | -109 | +70 | 37.9% | -0.71 | 2–2 (50%) | 5–8 (38%) | 98.2 | +1.41 | 1998 | 1999 | 161.9 | — | — | — | — | +10 | -105 | -16 | 64.0% | +0.82 | 12–7 (63%) | 19–11 (63%) | 106.8 | -4.34 |
| 28 | 2001 | 1533 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1914 | 156.7 | — | — | — | — | +32 | +22 | +54 | 63.2% | +0.70 | 14–10 (58%) | 26–16 (62%) | 99.2 | -0.18 |
| 29 | 2002 | 1503 | 95.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1862 | 141.9 | — | — | — | — | +57 | +9 | +96 | 54.5% | +0.48 | 3–4 (43%) | 7–10 (41%) | 93.4 | -0.87 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1816 | 132.4 | — | — | — | — | +63 | -59 | +147 | 51.3% | -0.17 | 6–3 (67%) | 6–5 (55%) | 100.3 | -0.33 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1786 | 147.1 | — | — | — | — | +51 | -34 | +125 | 58.3% | +0.40 | 6–6 (50%) | 14–10 (58%) | 98.5 | -2.19 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1842 | 133.5 | +2.69 | +0.10 | 1.096 | 51.8% | +8 | -108 | +98 | 61.8% | +0.46 | 1–5 (17%) | 9–6 (60%) | 94.9 | -0.41 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1688 | 130.3 | +1.82 | +0.03 | 1.029 | 50.4% | +23 | +23 | +195 | 43.8% | -0.21 | 5–6 (45%) | 10–9 (53%) | 98.0 | -1.17 |
| Career | — | 1653 | 115.4 | +0.12 | -3.11 | 0.882 | 48.1% | -24 | -109 | +118 | 42.8% | -0.61 | 12–17 (41%) | 21–21 (50%) | 102.1 | +4.16 | — | 2064 | 158.1 | +2.25 | +0.06 | 1.062 | 51.1% | +15 | -99 | +51 | 60.5% | +0.64 | 108–88 (55%) | 185–143 (56%) | 101.2 | -2.06 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Rusedski | 2 | 2 | 4 | Sep 16, 1999 | H2H |
| Vincent Spadea | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 5, 1999 | H2H |
| Byron Black | 1 | 1 | 2 | Oct 20, 2000 | H2H |
| Harel Levy | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 14, 2000 | H2H |
| David Prinosil | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 17, 2000 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pete Sampras | 4 | 18 | 22 | Apr 27, 2002 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 5 | 13 | 18 | Jan 26, 2001 | H2H |
| Richey Reneberg | 8 | 4 | 12 | Sep 3, 1999 | H2H |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 5 | 7 | 12 | Jun 30, 1999 | H2H |
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 3 | 7 | 10 | Mar 17, 2002 | H2H |