H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Laurence Tieleman vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 1-2
Vincent Spadea holds a 2–1 lead over Laurence Tieleman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Vincent Spadea leads 1–0 on clay, while Laurence Tieleman leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Vincent Spadea won the 1999 US Open third round 6-2 4-6 6-7(4) 6-2 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 53
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 1999* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Vincent Spadea | 6-2 4-6 6-7(4) 6-2 7-6(3) | Laurence Tieleman | Match data |
| Jun 17, 1999* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Laurence Tieleman | 1-6 6-3 6-4 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Sep 14, 1995* | Bogota | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Vincent Spadea | 6-1 6-3 | Laurence Tieleman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurence Tieleman | #1,442 | #76 | 625 | 1,652 | 41 | 62 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vincent Spadea | #1,474 | #18 | 1,629 | 1,876 | 310 | 348 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Laurence Tieleman | Vincent Spadea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #303 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #75 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #240 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #107 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #42 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #20 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #136 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–23 | 11.5% | #213 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #67 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #29 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #20 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #295 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1517 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |