H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Leander Paes vs David Dilucia H2H: 1-0
Leander Paes holds a 1–0 lead over David Dilucia in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leander Paes leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Leander Paes won the 1998 Newport third round 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
IND
Age 53
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 1998* | Newport | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Leander Paes | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | David Dilucia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leander Paes | #1,102 | #73 | 611 | 1,727 | 48 | 74 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| David Dilucia | #1,302 | #248 | 160 | 1,523 | 6 | 18 | 25.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leander Paes | David Dilucia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #363 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #383 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #122 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #279 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #91 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #378 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #188 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #432 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #760 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1032 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |