Leander Paes
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Byron Black | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 9, 1999 | H2H |
| Grant Stafford | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 10, 1998 | H2H |
| Jeff Tarango | 2 | 1 | 3 | Feb 1, 1997 | H2H |
| Mikael Tillstrom | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 21, 2000 | H2H |
| Cedric Pioline | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jan 7, 2000 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC
Leander Paes vs John Van Lottum H2H: 1-0
Leander Paes holds a 1–0 lead over John Van Lottum in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leander Paes leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Leander Paes won the 1998 Shanghai Masters round of 32 6-3 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leander Paes | 6-3 7-6(6) | John Van Lottum | Match data | Oct 8, 1998* | R32 | Shanghai Masters | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leander Paes | #1,102 | #73 | 611 | 1,737 | 53 | 77 | 40.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| John Van Lottum | — | — | — | 1,719 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leander Paes | John Van Lottum | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1996 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #129 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1997 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #122 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1998 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #91 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1999 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #188 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1032 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Leander Paes | John Van Lottum | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 1991 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1992 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1996 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1994 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1997 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1998 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% |
| 23 | 1996 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1999 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 56.7% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 24 | 1997 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 2000 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1998 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2001 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1999 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 25 | 50 | 75 | 33.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 18 | 13 | 31 | 58.1% | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | — | 30 | 46 | 76 | 39.5% | 13 | 27 | 40 | 32.5% | 13 | 15 | 28 | 46.4% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 106/129 of Leander Paes's and 41/41 of John Van Lottum's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Leander Paes | John Van Lottum | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 1991 | 3/3 | 3.0 | 3.7 | 58.6% | 71.0% | 47.9% | 77.5% | 23.3% | 61.5% | 35.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 4/4 | 3.0 | 4.8 | 66.2% | 67.5% | 51.2% | 45.8% | 42.6% | 61.8% | 38.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 4/5 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 58.1% | 73.3% | 37.5% | 40.8% | 32.0% | 58.1% | 38.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 11/12 | 2.9 | 3.8 | 61.2% | 64.3% | 45.8% | 55.8% | 32.3% | 57.2% | 32.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1996 | 16/24 | 4.2 | 3.7 | 61.2% | 68.8% | 47.3% | 55.1% | 40.0% | 60.6% | 38.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1997 | 25/31 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 61.6% | 74.3% | 49.6% | 58.7% | 39.3% | 64.9% | 36.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1998 | 20/23 | 4.1 | 2.9 | 58.7% | 71.2% | 53.2% | 70.8% | 45.8% | 63.8% | 38.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1999 | 10/12 | 3.4 | 4.4 | 56.2% | 71.4% | 50.7% | 61.7% | 31.5% | 62.2% | 33.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 7/9 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 61.1% | 65.9% | 46.3% | 44.5% | 26.8% | 58.0% | 29.9% | 2003 | 24/24 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 55.8% | 69.8% | 48.0% | 59.5% | 55.2% | 60.3% | 36.2% |
| 28 | 2001 | 3/3 | 8.7 | 7.3 | 58.3% | 70.9% | 42.7% | 53.6% | 31.8% | 59.1% | 30.1% | 2004 | 16/16 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 58.5% | 68.9% | 49.0% | 60.1% | 34.7% | 60.5% | 32.1% |
| 29 | 2002 | 1/1 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 55.0% | 54.5% | 55.6% | 20.0% | — | 55.0% | 28.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 58.4% | 61.0% | 50.0% | 66.7% | 42.9% | 56.4% | 37.6% | 2006 | 1/1 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 51.3% | 64.1% | 54.1% | 66.7% | 25.0% | 59.2% | 30.6% |
| 32 | 2005 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 60.0% | 66.7% | 41.7% | 42.9% | 66.7% | 56.7% | 27.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Leander Paes | John Van Lottum | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 1991 | 1493 | 103.0 | -1.66 | +0.58 | 0.932 | 49.1% | +36 | — | — | 28.6% | -0.43 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1992 | 1486 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.0% | -2.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 1483 | 104.5 | -0.63 | +0.03 | 0.998 | 49.6% | +25 | — | — | 36.4% | -0.18 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | +0.15 | 1996 | 1491 | 106.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.75 | — | — | — | -0.35 |
| 21 | 1994 | 1496 | 104.2 | -1.44 | -1.83 | 0.912 | 47.8% | +3 | — | — | 41.7% | -0.92 | 0–1 | 2–0 | — | +0.34 | 1997 | 1631 | 121.6 | — | — | — | — | -56 | -46 | +18 | 64.5% | +0.77 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–2 (60%) | 100.2 | -0.05 |
| 22 | 1995 | 1486 | 109.8 | -2.61 | -2.49 | 0.768 | 45.6% | +14 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.29 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | 99.3 | +0.09 | 1998 | 1612 | 120.7 | — | — | — | — | -50 | -79 | +129 | 40.7% | -0.59 | 5–3 (63%) | 3–7 (30%) | 101.6 | +0.05 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1655 | 129.5 | -1.01 | -0.14 | 0.975 | 49.4% | -32 | — | -11 | 50.0% | -0.11 | 4–1 (80%) | 5–5 (50%) | 105.7 | +0.13 | 1999 | 1662 | 128.3 | — | — | — | — | +36 | -181 | +3 | 49.1% | -0.33 | 6–6 (50%) | 13–3 (81%) | 107.6 | +1.68 |
| 24 | 1997 | 1634 | 115.9 | +1.36 | -1.27 | 1.044 | 50.5% | -37 | -94 | +43 | 43.0% | -0.43 | 4–5 (44%) | 4–9 (31%) | 96.3 | +1.81 | 2000 | 1517 | 104.0 | — | — | — | — | +57 | — | — | 18.5% | -2.33 | 0–2 | 0–2 | — | +0.38 |
| 25 | 1998 | 1660 | 131.9 | +0.72 | +0.24 | 1.053 | 51.4% | -30 | — | +69 | 51.0% | +0.26 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–4 (33%) | 98.3 | +1.30 | 2001 | 1584 | 111.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.87 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.48 |
| 26 | 1999 | 1562 | 108.9 | -1.02 | -2.19 | 0.884 | 47.9% | -19 | — | +132 | 25.0% | -1.18 | 1–1 | 1–4 (20%) | — | +0.75 | 2002 | 1624 | 118.0 | — | — | — | — | -2 | -68 | — | 50.0% | -0.30 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.19 |
| 27 | 2000 | 1538 | 104.1 | -1.46 | -3.99 | 0.711 | 44.3% | +15 | — | — | 36.4% | -1.23 | 0–1 | 3–1 (75%) | — | +0.88 | 2003 | 1599 | 123.9 | -1.54 | -1.36 | 0.912 | 48.4% | -3 | +14 | -27 | 46.7% | -0.27 | 3–4 (43%) | 3–2 (60%) | 101.1 | +0.37 |
| 28 | 2001 | 1596 | 106.9 | -0.83 | -2.86 | 0.736 | 45.8% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.48 | 2004 | 1512 | 123.3 | -1.67 | -2.93 | 0.813 | 47.0% | +60 | +41 | +27 | 37.5% | -1.07 | 0–6 (0%) | 3–1 (75%) | 96.3 | -0.92 |
| 29 | 2002 | 1579 | 97.0 | -2.95 | -4.40 | 0.628 | 40.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 1572 | 104.5 | +2.28 | -1.66 | 0.864 | 47.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.50 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.16 | 2006 | 1511 | 103.1 | +0.34 | +3.36 | 0.751 | 46.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.12 |
| 32 | 2005 | 1551 | 95.8 | -1.30 | -1.39 | 0.637 | 42.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1738 | 121.9 | -0.33 | -1.21 | 0.934 | 48.8% | -15 | -94 | +47 | 40.3% | -0.54 | 14–15 (48%) | 20–31 (39%) | 96.9 | +4.92 | — | 1719 | 126.6 | -1.54 | -1.86 | 0.869 | 47.8% | +15 | -52 | +48 | 43.0% | -0.64 | 15–25 (38%) | 27–20 (57%) | 100.9 | +0.48 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
John Van Lottum
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Felix Mantilla | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jan 9, 2004 | — |
| Galo Blanco | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jan 8, 2004 | — |
| Paradorn Srichaphan | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 23, 2003 | — |
| Marc Rosset | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 11, 2003 | — |
| Arnaud Clement | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jan 19, 2000 | — |