H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Leander Paes vs Marcos Ondruska H2H: 1-0
Leander Paes holds a 1–0 lead over Marcos Ondruska in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leander Paes leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leander Paes won the 1996 US Open first round 7-6(3) 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
IND
Age 53
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 53
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2001* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q3 | Hard | Marcos Ondruska | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | Leander Paes | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q3 | Hard | Leander Paes | 7-6(4) 7-6(5) | Marcos Ondruska | Match data |
| Aug 28, 1996* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Leander Paes | 7-6(3) 6-2 7-5 | Marcos Ondruska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leander Paes | #1,102 | #73 | 611 | 1,727 | 48 | 74 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Marcos Ondruska | #1,352 | #27 | 1,007 | 1,785 | 105 | 137 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leander Paes | Marcos Ondruska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #256 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #137 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #67 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #47 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #98 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #114 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #102 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #122 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #91 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #142 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #188 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #263 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1032 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |