H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Leander Paes vs Mark Knowles H2H: 1-0
Leander Paes holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Knowles in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leander Paes leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Leander Paes won the 1996 Newport fourth round 6-7(3) 7-6(5) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
IND
Age 53
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BAH
Age 54
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 1996* | Newport | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Leander Paes | 6-7(3) 7-6(5) 7-5 | Mark Knowles | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leander Paes | #1,102 | #73 | 611 | 1,727 | 48 | 74 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mark Knowles | #1,400 | #96 | 484 | 1,623 | 23 | 51 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Leander Paes | Mark Knowles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #430 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #291 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #258 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #139 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #122 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #117 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #91 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #273 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #188 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #350 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1032 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |